Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804482›Full record

ArticleNeurology international2024

The Effectiveness of Paired Associative Stimulation on Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Andrea Baroni, Annibale Antonioni, Giulia Fregna, Nicola Lamberti, Fabio Manfredini, Giacomo Koch, Alessandro D'Ausilio, Sofia Straudi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea BaroniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-3090
Annibale AntonioniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-6418
Giulia FregnaDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Nicola LambertiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5763-3069
Fabio ManfrediniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9476-6434
Giacomo KochDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandro D'AusilioDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Sofia StraudiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-9922

Funding

EU project PRIMI HORIZON-CL4-2022-DIGITAL-EMER- GING-02-101120727Ministry of University and Research (MUR), National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) project MNESYS (PE0000006)Ricerca Finalizzata 2018 - Giovani Ricercatori GR-2018-12366027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paired associative stimulation (PAS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation. PAS allows connections between cortical areas and peripheral nerves (C/P PAS) or between cortical regions (C/C PAS) to be strengthened or weakened by spike-timing-dependent neural plasticity mechanisms. Since PAS modulates both neurophysiological features and motor performance, there is growing interest in its application in neurorehabilitation. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the motor rehabilitation role of PAS in stroke patients. We performed a literature search following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Framework. Eight studies were included: one investigated C/C PAS between the cerebellum and the affected primary motor area (M1), seven applied C/P PAS over the lesional, contralesional, or both M1. Seven studies evaluated the outcome on upper limb and one on lower limb motor recovery. Although several studies omit crucial methodological details, PAS highlighted effects mainly on corticospinal excitability, and, more rarely, an improvement in motor performance. However, most studies failed to prove a correlation between neurophysiological changes and motor improvement. Although current studies seem to suggest a role of PAS in post-stroke rehabilitation, their heterogeneity and limited number do not yet allow definitive conclusions to be drawn.

Indexed as

neurophysiologyneurorehabilitationnon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)paired associative stimulation (PAS)plasticitystroke

Identifiers

PMID38804482
PMCPMC11130975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.