ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Referral Process Enhancement: Innovative Approaches and Best Practices.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining a theoretical framework for a quality referral at the primary-secondary care interface: a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- The Access, Initiation, Engagement, Retention, and Recovery (AIERR) Model: A Stage-Based Framework for Understanding Mental Health Service Utilization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Digital health to strengthen pediatric surgical referral and follow-up in Low-resource settings: progress, gaps, and future directions.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Transforming hematology care in LMICs: strategies for enhanced diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Innovation Culture in Oncology (IC-O) Scale: Psychometric Development and Validation Among Healthcare Professionals at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Oman.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Using FMEA to Reduce the Risk of Delayed Reporting of Critical Radiological Results in Oncology: A Patient Safety Initiative.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Improving Turnaround Times and Operational Efficiency in Radiology Services: Quality Improvement Study in Oman.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Improving the Timely Reporting of Critical Radiological Results in Oncology to Enhance Patient Safety (A Quality Improvement Initiative at SQCCCRC).Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Enhancing Medication Safety: Reducing Administration Errors in Oncology Setting.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Holmium Laser Prostatectomy for Primary Bladder Neck Obstruction (PBNO): Comparative Efficacy and Safety Outcomes versus Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to enhance the efficiency of the referral system at the Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC) in Muscat, Oman by reducing the average time for new patients' acceptance and the delay between patient acceptance and their first appointment.
methodsA one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental project was conducted from Quarter 2 of 2022 to Quarter 2 of 2023. Data collected during the pretest and posttest phases were compared to evaluate the impact of interventions on the average days for patient acceptance and the time to first appointment after acceptance. The intervention involved developing a comprehensive referral system incorporating technology development, improved accessibility, orientation materials, internal training, policy formulation, criteria definition, and tailoring acceptance criteria to specialty programs. Awareness campaigns were also conducted to educate patients about the referral process and available transportation options. The project followed the FOCUS PDCA (Find, Organize, Clarify, Understand, Select, Plan, Do, Check, Act) approach for implementation.
resultSignificant improvements were observed in the oncology referral process, with the average days for patient acceptance decreasing from 4.3 days to 1.3 days post-implementation. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of this change (F-value = 46.25, p < .0001). Similarly, the average days to first visit appointment after acceptance decreased from 8.6 days to 4.0 days, with statistical support (F-value = 6.29, p < .0).
conclusionThis study represents a significant advancement in optimizing the oncology referral process. When considered in conjunction with previous research findings, it underscores the importance of ongoing efforts to enhance efficiency in patient referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.