Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38809844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Initial data analysis for longitudinal studies to build a solid foundation for reproducible analysis.

Lara Lusa, Cécile Proust-Lima, Carsten O Schmidt, Katherine J Lee, Saskia le Cessie, Mark Baillie, Frank Lawrence, Marianne Huebner, TG3 of the STRATOS Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lara LusaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Capodistria, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-2421
Cécile Proust-LimaUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR1219, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-955X
Carsten O SchmidtInstitute for community Medicine, SHIP-KEF University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Katherine J LeeClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Saskia le CessieDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mark BaillieNovartis, Basel, Switzerland.
Frank LawrenceCenter for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.
Marianne HuebnerCenter for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9694-9231
TG3 of the STRATOS Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial data analysis (IDA) is the part of the data pipeline that takes place between the end of data retrieval and the beginning of data analysis that addresses the research question. Systematic IDA and clear reporting of the IDA findings is an important step towards reproducible research. A general framework of IDA for observational studies includes data cleaning, data screening, and possible updates of pre-planned statistical analyses. Longitudinal studies, where participants are observed repeatedly over time, pose additional challenges, as they have special features that should be taken into account in the IDA steps before addressing the research question. We propose a systematic approach in longitudinal studies to examine data properties prior to conducting planned statistical analyses. In this paper we focus on the data screening element of IDA, assuming that the research aims are accompanied by an analysis plan, meta-data are well documented, and data cleaning has already been performed. IDA data screening comprises five types of explorations, covering the analysis of participation profiles over time, evaluation of missing data, presentation of univariate and multivariate descriptions, and the depiction of longitudinal aspects. Executing the IDA plan will result in an IDA report to inform data analysts about data properties and possible implications for the analysis plan-another element of the IDA framework. Our framework is illustrated focusing on hand grip strength outcome data from a data collection across several waves in a complex survey. We provide reproducible R code on a public repository, presenting a detailed data screening plan for the investigation of the average rate of age-associated decline of grip strength. With our checklist and reproducible R code we provide data analysts a framework to work with longitudinal data in an informed way, enhancing the reproducibility and validity of their work.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleReproducibility of ResultsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID38809844
PMCPMC11135704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.