ArticleArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2024
The role of the osteoprotegerin/RANKL/RANK axis and osteopontin in acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to ascertain the levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and osteopontin (OPN), alongside osteoprotegerin/RANKL ratio (ORR), and assess their association with the SYNTAX score and ascertain the potential of these molecules as predictive markers for risk, aiding in risk stratification. Eventually, they could potentially be employed even before angiography to gauge the severity of coronary lesions. Methods: Prospective study with 147 participants, 101 (69%) were men, with an average age of 60. We included three groups - (1) patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (ACS-PCI), (2) patients without ACS who underwent coronary angiography for an indication other than ischemia and did not undergo PCI (non-ACS without), and (3) one asymptomatic subject. OPG and OPN were measured. ORR and SYNTAX scores were calculated. The association between OPG and OPN levels and important clinical variables was investigated. Results: OPG levels in Group 1 were lower compared to Groups 2 and 3 (controls), Group 1 (490 pg/mL) versus Group 2 (829 pg/mL) versus Group 3 (845 pg/mL) (p = 0.001). OPG had lower levels in patients with coronary artery stenosis versus without stenosis. A decrease in ORR was shown in all groups and no association with the SYNTAX score. Conclusion: OPG and OPN (and ORR) levels are decreased in patients with ACS and show no correlation with the SYNTAX score. As an exploratory study, our work suggest that increased OPG and OPN levels in non-ACS patients may have, in fact, a protective effect. This study is one of the few with an appropriate control in ACS and reproducibility is necessary mainly with multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.