ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Optical coherence tomography angiography evaluation of retinal and choroidal microvascular changes in pregnant women with a history of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo study retinal and choroidal microcirculation by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in pregnant women with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) and to compare them with healthy pregnant and nonpregnant subjects.
methodsPregnant women with an unexplained history of RSA (group 1), healthy pregnant (group 2), and healthy non-pregnant women (group 3) were included in the study. After a thorough ophthalmologic examination:best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure,slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination,autorefractometer, biometry, and axial length measurement; OCT and OCTA measurements were performed with Swept Source OCT-Angiography (Topcon Co, Japan).
resultsThe nonpregnant group had higher values for central foveal superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) vessel density (VD) and lower values for superior, inferior, and mean VD compared with pregnant groups (p < 0.001). Choriocapillaris values (CC) VD were higher in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3 (p < 0.001). The group with unexplained RSA had a relatively smaller FAZ (foveal avascular zone) area than the group of healthy pregnant women (p:0.047). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the retina, retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, and choroidal thickness (p > 0.05).
conclusionAlthough our study did not identify any etiology in pregnant women with RSA, we observed detectable differences in FAZ area and vessel density values using OCTA, when comparing them with healthy pregnant women and healthy nonpregnant controls. We believe that OCTA, as used in many pathologies such as diabetic and hypertensive retinopathy and retinal vascular occlusion, can also be extended to unexplained RSA both to detect etiology and to monitor treatment in studies with a larger number of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38811404What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.