Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38811801›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2024

Building and analyzing metacells in single-cell genomics data.

Mariia Bilous, Léonard Hérault, Aurélie Ag Gabriel, Matei Teleman, David Gfeller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bridging unpaired single-cell multimodal data for integrative analyses with SuperMap.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. mcRigor: A Statistical Software Package for Evaluating and Optimizing Metacell Partitioning in Single-Cell Data Analysis.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariia Bilous *Department of Oncology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-5709
Léonard Hérault *Department of Oncology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-2991
Aurélie Ag Gabriel *Department of Oncology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-3622
Matei TelemanDepartment of Oncology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David GfellerDepartment of Oncology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Lausanne, University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. david.gfeller@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-0930

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A_173156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of high-throughput single-cell genomics technologies has fundamentally transformed biological sciences. Currently, millions of cells from complex biological tissues can be phenotypically profiled across multiple modalities. The scaling of computational methods to analyze and visualize such data is a constant challenge, and tools need to be regularly updated, if not redesigned, to cope with ever-growing numbers of cells. Over the last few years, metacells have been introduced to reduce the size and complexity of single-cell genomics data while preserving biologically relevant information and improving interpretability. Here, we review recent studies that capitalize on the concept of metacells-and the many variants in nomenclature that have been used. We further outline how and when metacells should (or should not) be used to analyze single-cell genomics data and what should be considered when analyzing such data at the metacell level. To facilitate the exploration of metacells, we provide a comprehensive tutorial on the construction and analysis of metacells from single-cell RNA-seq data ( https://github.com/GfellerLab/MetacellAnalysisTutorial ) as well as a fully integrated pipeline to rapidly build, visualize and evaluate metacells with different methods ( https://github.com/GfellerLab/MetacellAnalysisToolkit ).

Indexed as

GenomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansSoftwareCoarse-grainingMetacellsSingle-cell Data AnalysisSingle-cell GenomicsTutorial

Identifiers

PMID38811801
PMCPMC11220014

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.