Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38812804›Full record

SynthesisBulletin of the World Health Organization2024

Health literacy and tuberculosis control: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arohi Chauhan, Malik Parmar, Girish C Dash, Sandeep Chauhan, Krushna C Sahoo, Kajal Samantaray, Jessica Sharma, Pranab Mahapatra, Sanghamitra Pati

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Annals of global health · 2026
    Article
  10. Tuberculosis: An Ongoing Global Threat.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arohi ChauhanPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Malik ParmarCountry Office for India, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India.
Girish C DashIndian Council of Medical Research, Regional Medical Research Centre, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha751023, India.
Sandeep ChauhanWHO National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme Technical Support Network, New Delhi, India.
Krushna C SahooIndian Council of Medical Research, Regional Medical Research Centre, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha751023, India.
Kajal SamantarayIndian Council of Medical Research, Regional Medical Research Centre, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha751023, India.
Jessica SharmaIndian Council of Medical Research, Regional Medical Research Centre, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha751023, India.
Pranab MahapatraDepartment of Psychiatry, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sanghamitra PatiIndian Council of Medical Research, Regional Medical Research Centre, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Odisha751023, India.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify literature on health literacy levels and examine its association with tuberculosis treatment adherence and treatment outcomes. Methods: Two authors independently searched Pubmed®, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, LILACS, Global Health Medicus and ScienceDirect for articles reporting on health literacy levels and tuberculosis that were published between January 2000 and September 2023. We defined limited health literacy as a person's inability to understand, process, and make decisions from information obtained concerning their own health. Methodological quality and the risk of bias was assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools. We used a random effects model to assess the pooled proportion of limited health literacy, the association between health literacy and treatment adherence, and the relationship between health literacy and tuberculosis-related knowledge. Findings: Among 5813 records reviewed, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that 51.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 48.0-54.3) of tuberculosis patients exhibit limited health literacy. Based on four studies, patients with lower health literacy levels were less likely to adhere to tuberculosis treatment regimens (pooled odds ratio: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.37-2.78). Three studies showed a significant relationship between low health literacy and inadequate knowledge about tuberculosis (pooled correlation coefficient: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.32-0.94). Conclusion: Health literacy is associated with tuberculosis treatment adherence and care quality. Lower health literacy might hamper patients' ability to follow treatment protocols. Improving health literacy is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes and is a key strategy in the fight against tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyTuberculosisHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedication Adherence

Identifiers

PMID38812804
PMCPMC11132163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.