Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813447›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment of early gestational diabetes mellitus: economic evaluation of the TOBOGM study, an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Mohammad M Haque, W Kathy Tannous, William H Herman, Jincy Immanuel, William M Hague, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott, N Wah Cheung, Emily Hibbert, Christopher J Nolan and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Mohammad M HaqueTranslational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
W Kathy TannousSchool of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
William H HermanSchools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Jincy ImmanuelSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
William M HagueRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Helena TeedeMonash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Joanne EnticottMonash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
N Wah CheungWestmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Emily HibbertNepean Clinical School, University of Sydney and Nepean Hospital, Nepean, NSW, Australia.
Christopher J NolanCanberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Michael J PeekAustralian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Vincent W WongLiverpool Hospital, Liverpool and University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.
Jeff R FlackBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia.
Mark McleanBlacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia.
Arianne SweetingDepartment of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emily GianattiDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Hospitals, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Alexandra Kautzky-WillerGender Medicine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jürgen HarreiterGender Medicine Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Viswanathan MohanDr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Center and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Helena BackmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
David SimmonsSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
TOBOGM Consortium

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A recently undertaken multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) " Methods: Participants' healthcare resource utilization data were collected from their self-reported questionnaires and hospital records, and valued using the unit costs obtained from standard Australian national sources. Costs were reported in US dollars ($) using the purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates to facilitate comparison of costs across countries. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was followed. Missing cost data were replaced using multiple imputations. Bootstrapping method was used to estimate the uncertainty around mean cost difference and cost-effectiveness results. Bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were used to plot the cost-effectiveness (CE) plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC). Findings: Diagnosis and treatment of early GDM was more effective and tended to be less costly, i.e., dominant (cost-saving) [-5.6% composite adverse pregnancy outcome (95% CI: -10.1%, -1.2%), -$1373 (95% CI: -$3,749, $642)] compared with usual care. Our findings were confirmed by both the CE plane (88% of the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs fall in the south-west quadrant), and CEAC (the probability of the intervention being cost-effective ranged from 84% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value of $10,000-99% at a WTP threshold value of $100,000 per composite adverse pregnancy outcome prevented). Sub-group analyses demonstrated that diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women in the higher glycemic range (fasting blood glucose 95-109 mg/dl [5.3-6.0 mmol/L], 1-h blood glucose ≥191 mg/dl [10.6 mmol/L] and/or 2-h blood glucose 162-199 mg/dl [9.0-11.0 mmol/L]) was more effective and less costly (dominant) [ Interpretation: Our findings highlight the potential health and economic benefits from the diagnosis and treatment of early GDM among women with risk factors for hyperglycemia in pregnancy and supports its implementation. Long-term follow-up studies are recommended as a key future area of research to assess the potential long-term health benefits and economic consequences of the intervention. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council (grants 1104231 and 2009326), Region O¨rebro Research Committee (grants Dnr OLL-970566 and OLL-942177), Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Vienna (project 15,205 and project 23,026), South Western Sydney Local Health District Academic Unit (grant 2016), and Western Sydney University Ainsworth Trust Grant (2019).

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationFirst trimesterGestational diabetes mellitusHyperglycemiaNeonatal intensive carePregnancyRandomized controlled trialScreening

Identifiers

PMID38813447
PMCPMC11133791

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.