Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816737›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2024

Modeling cerebrospinal fluid dynamics across the entire intracranial space through integration of four-dimensional flow and intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging.

Shigeki Yamada, Tomohiro Otani, Satoshi Ii, Hirotaka Ito, Chifumi Iseki, Motoki Tanikawa, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Shigeo Wada, Marie Oshima, Mitsuhito Mase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Fluid dynamics model of the cerebral ventricular system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Neurofluids.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shigeki YamadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan. shigekiyamada393@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7158-5569
Tomohiro OtaniDepartment of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi IiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotaka ItoMedical System Research & Development Center, FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Chifumi IsekiDepartment of Behavioural Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Motoki TanikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Yoshiyuki WatanabeDepartment of Radiology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
Shigeo WadaDepartment of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Marie OshimaInterfaculty Initiative in Information Studies/Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuhito MaseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-Cho, Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K09098Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H00190Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H03020Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology DJPMXP1020230118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBidirectional reciprocal motion of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was quantified using four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI. To estimate various CSF motions in the entire intracranial region, we attempted to integrate the flow parameters calculated using the two MRI sequences. To elucidate how CSF dynamics deteriorate in Hakim's disease, an age-dependent chronic hydrocephalus, flow parameters were estimated from the two MRI sequences to assess CSF motion in the entire intracranial region.

methodsThis study included 127 healthy volunteers aged ≥ 20 years and 44 patients with Hakim's disease. On 4D flow MRI for measuring CSF motion, velocity encoding was set at 5 cm/s. For the IVIM MRI analysis, the diffusion-weighted sequence was set at six b-values (i.e., 0, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 s/mm

resultsThe VA on 4D flow MRI was significantly associated with the mean f-values on IVIM MRI. Therefore, we estimated VA that could not be directly measured on 4D flow MRI from the mean f-values on IVIM MRI in the intracranial CSF space, using the following formula; e

conclusionsWe estimated pulsatile CSF movements in the entire intracranial CSF space in healthy individuals and patients with Hakim's disease using FOI integrating VA from 4D flow MRI and f-values from IVIM MRI. FOI is useful for quantifying the CSF oscillation.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedBrainFemaleHumansHydrocephalusHydrodynamicsMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult4D Flow MRIAgingCerebrospinal fluid dynamicsCSF motionDiffusion-weighted imageFluid oscillationHakim’s diseaseIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusIntravoxel incoherent motion

Identifiers

PMID38816737
PMCPMC11138021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.