ArticleFrontiers in big data2024
Development and application of a machine learning-based predictive model for obstructive sleep apnea screening.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Explainable Machine Learning Validation of a Novel Sleep Disturbance Ratio for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting Adverse ICU Outcomes from Admission-Time Frailty and Nocturnal Sleep Fragmentation Using Explainable AI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Critically Ill Patients: A Structured Narrative Review of Prevalence, Diagnostic Barriers, and Clinical Implications in the ICU.Clocks & sleep · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Based Multidimensional Oximetry for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening: Development and External Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Machine learning optimization of obstructive sleep apnea screening: development and validation of a gradient boosting prediction model with a clinical implementation framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning approach for predicting the severity risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- ACF-SAP: A machine learning framework for predicting obstructive sleep apnea severity using anthropometric and clinical features.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Integrative Assessment of Cephalometric and Polysomnographic Features in Paediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in surgical planning and outcome prediction for obstructive sleep apnea: emerging hype or the future standard?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Review
- The Bidirectional Relationship Between FGIDs and Anxiety: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and New Therapeutic Strategies.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2025Review
- Obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP therapy, and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: evidence from a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a robust machine learning prediction model for the automatic screening and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using five advanced algorithms, namely Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Random Forest (RF) to provide substantial support for early clinical diagnosis and intervention. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 439 patients who underwent polysomnography at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between October 2019 and October 2022. Predictor variables such as demographic information [age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI)], medical history, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) were used. Univariate analysis was used to identify variables with significant differences, and the dataset was then divided into training and validation sets in a 4:1 ratio. The training set was established to predict OSA severity grading. The validation set was used to assess model performance using the area under the curve (AUC). Additionally, a separate analysis was conducted, categorizing the normal population as one group and patients with moderate-to-severe OSA as another. The same univariate analysis was applied, and the dataset was divided into training and validation sets in a 4:1 ratio. The training set was used to build a prediction model for screening moderate-to-severe OSA, while the validation set was used to verify the model's performance. Results: Among the four groups, the LightGBM model outperformed others, with the top five feature importance rankings of ESS total score, BMI, sex, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), where Age, ESS total score and BMI played the most significant roles. In the dichotomous model, RF is the best performer of the five models respectively. The top five ranked feature importance of the best-performing RF models were ESS total score, BMI, GERD, age and Dry mouth, with ESS total score and BMI being particularly pivotal. Conclusion: Machine learning-based prediction models for OSA disease grading and screening prove instrumental in the early identification of patients with moderate-to-severe OSA, revealing pertinent risk factors and facilitating timely interventions to counter pathological changes induced by OSA. Notably, ESS total score and BMI emerge as the most critical features for predicting OSA, emphasizing their significance in clinical assessments. The dataset will be publicly available on my Github.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.