ArticleDigital health
Malignancy pattern analysis of breast ultrasound images using clinical features and a graph convolutional network.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A segmentation-guided CNN-Vision transformer feature fusion framework for multi-class breast ultrasound image classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- HyFusion-X: hybrid deep and traditional feature fusion with ensemble classifiers for breast cancer detection using mammogram and ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Class Classification of Breast Ultrasound Images Using Vision Transformer-Based Ensemble Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging advanced graph neural networks for the enhanced classification of post anesthesia states to aid surgical procedures.PloS one · 2025Article
- Role of inter- and extra-lesion tissue, transfer learning, and fine-tuning in the robust classification of breast lesions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Early diagnosis of breast cancer can lead to effective treatment, possibly increase long-term survival rates, and improve quality of life. The objective of this study is to present an automated analysis and classification system for breast cancer using clinical markers such as tumor shape, orientation, margin, and surrounding tissue. The novelty and uniqueness of the study lie in the approach of considering medical features based on the diagnosis of radiologists. Methods: Using clinical markers, a graph is generated where each feature is represented by a node, and the connection between them is represented by an edge which is derived through Pearson's correlation method. A graph convolutional network (GCN) model is proposed to classify breast tumors into benign and malignant, using the graph data. Several statistical tests are performed to assess the importance of the proposed features. The performance of the proposed GCN model is improved by experimenting with different layer configurations and hyper-parameter settings. Results: Results show that the proposed model has a 98.73% test accuracy. The performance of the model is compared with a graph attention network, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network, and five transfer learning models, ten machine learning models, and three ensemble learning models. The performance of the model was further assessed with three supplementary breast cancer ultrasound image datasets, where the accuracies are 91.03%, 94.37%, and 89.62% for Dataset A, Dataset B, and Dataset C (combining Dataset A and Dataset B) respectively. Overfitting issues are assessed through k-fold cross-validation. Conclusion: Several variants are utilized to present a more rigorous and fair evaluation of our work, especially the importance of extracting clinically relevant features. Moreover, a GCN model using graph data can be a promising solution for an automated feature-based breast image classification system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.