ArticleJournal of Cancer2024
Identification and validation of a novel apoptosis-related prognostic risk score model for lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic roles of apoptosis-related genes (ARGs) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have not been fully elucidated. In this study, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with apoptosis and the hub genes were further identified. The prognostic values of the ARGs were evaluated using the LASSO Cox regression method. Prognostic values were determined using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in the TCGA and GEO datasets. The correlations, mutation data, and protein expression of the 10 ARGs predictive models were also analyzed. We identified 130 differentially expressed ARGs. DEGs were used to split LUAD cases into two subtypes whose overall survival (OS) were significantly different (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.