Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818119›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2024

In situ light-activated materials for skin wound healing and repair: A narrative review.

Jordan R Yaron, Mallikarjun Gosangi, Shubham Pallod, Kaushal Rege

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan R YaronCenter for Biomaterials Innovation and Translation, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-474X
Mallikarjun GosangiCenter for Biomaterials Innovation and Translation, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8676-7282
Shubham PallodCenter for Biomaterials Innovation and Translation, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-7494
Kaushal RegeCenter for Biomaterials Innovation and Translation, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7423-2520

Funding

Photothermal Nanocomposites for Tissue RepairR01EB020690 · NIBIB · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI REGE, KAUSHAL · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
Bioengineered Skin SealantsR01AR074627 · NIAMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI REGE, KAUSHAL · 2020 to 2023
$1.5M
Laser-Activated Nanoglues for the prevention and control of surgical site infectionsR21AI147279 · NIAID · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI REGE, KAUSHAL · 2020 to 2021
$413k
Inflammasome-modulating Polymeric Biomaterials to Augment Tissue RepairK01EB031984 · NIBIB · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI YARON, JORDAN ROBIN · 2021 to 2023
$303k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI147279NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074627NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB031984NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermal wounds are a major global health burden made worse by common comorbidities such as diabetes and infection. Appropriate wound closure relies on a highly coordinated series of cellular events, ultimately bridging tissue gaps and regenerating normal physiological structures. Wound dressings are an important component of wound care management, providing a barrier against external insults while preserving the active reparative processes underway within the wound bed. The development of wound dressings with biomaterial constituents has become an attractive design strategy due to the varied functions intrinsic in biological polymers, such as cell instructiveness, growth factor binding, antimicrobial properties, and tissue integration. Using photosensitive agents to generate crosslinked or photopolymerized dressings in situ provides an opportunity to develop dressings rapidly within the wound bed, facilitating robust adhesion to the wound bed for greater barrier protection and adaptation to irregular wound shapes. Despite the popularity of this fabrication approach, relatively few experimental wound dressings have undergone preclinical translation into animal models, limiting the overall integrity of assessing their potential as effective wound dressings. Here, we provide an up-to-date narrative review of reported photoinitiator- and wavelength-guided design strategies for in situ light activation of biomaterial dressings that have been evaluated in preclinical wound healing models.

Indexed as

biomaterialin situphotoactivationphotoinitiationwound dressingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID38818119
PMCPMC11135152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.