ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2024
Engineering Agonistic Bispecifics to Investigate the Influence of Distance on Surface-Mediated Complement Activation.
Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of bitopic nanobody-ligand conjugates targeting G protein-coupled receptors and exhibiting logic-gated signaling.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Structural basis for surface activation of the classical complement cascade by the short pentraxin C-reactive protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of agonists capable of activating the human complement system by binding to the C1 complex presents a novel approach for targeted cell killing. Bispecific nanobodies and Abs can successfully use C1 for this purpose; however, efficacy varies significantly between epitopes, Ab type, and bispecific design. To address this variability, we investigated monomeric agonists of C1 in the form of bispecific nanobodies, which lack Fc domains that lead to oligomerization in Abs. These therefore offer an ideal opportunity to explore the geometric parameters crucial for C1 activation. In this study, we explored the impact of linker length as a metric for Ag and epitope location. DNA nanotechnology and protein engineering allowed us to design linkers with controlled lengths and flexibilities, revealing a critical range of end-to-end distances for optimal complement activation. We discovered that differences in complement activation were not caused by differential C1 activation or subsequent cleavage of C4, but instead impacted C4b deposition and downstream membrane lysis. Considering the importance of Ab class and subclass, this study provides insights into the structural requirements of C1 binding and activation, highlighting linker and hinge engineering as a potential strategy to enhance potency over specific cellular targets. Additionally, using DNA nanotechnology to modify geometric parameters demonstrated the potential for synthetic biology in complement activation. Overall, this research offers valuable insights into the design and optimization of agonists for targeted cell killing through complement activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.