ArticlePlant cell reports2024
Identification of superior haplotypes for flowering time in pigeonpea through candidate gene-based association study of a diverse minicore collection.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subspecies-specific haplotype signatures for customizing blanchability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) via haplotype-based breeding.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Genomic dissection of iron toxicity tolerance in rice identifies key loci, candidate genes, and associated haplotypes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dissecting multi-rust resistance in wheat through genome-wide association study, haplotype analysis, and marker validation.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Dissecting the genetic architecture of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in Indian dwarf wheat (Triticum sphaerococcum) by multi-locus association analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key messageIn current study candidate gene (261 genes) based association mapping on 144 pigeonpea accessions for flowering time and related traits and 29 MTAs producing eight superior haplotypes were identified. In the current study, we have conducted an association analysis for flowering-associated traits in a diverse pigeonpea mini-core collection comprising 144 accessions using the SNP data of 261 flowering-related genes. In total, 13,449 SNPs were detected in the current study, which ranged from 743 (ICP10228) to 1469 (ICP6668) among the individuals. The nucleotide diversity (0.28) and Watterson estimates (0.34) reflected substantial diversity, while Tajima's D (-0.70) indicated the abundance of rare alleles in the collection. A total of 29 marker trait associations (MTAs) were identified, among which 19 were unique to days to first flowering (DOF) and/or days to fifty percent flowering (DFF), 9 to plant height (PH), and 1 to determinate (Det) growth habit using 3 years of phenotypic data. Among these MTAs, six were common to DOF and/or DFF, and four were common to DOF/DFF along with the PH, reflecting their pleiotropic action. These 29 MTAs spanned 25 genes, among which 10 genes clustered in the protein-protein network analysis, indicating their concerted involvement in floral induction. Furthermore, we identified eight haplotypes, four of which regulate late flowering, while the remaining four regulate early flowering using the MTAs. Interestingly, haplotypes conferring late flowering (H001, H002, and H008) were found to be taller, while those involved in early flowering (H003) were shorter in height. The expression pattern of these genes, as inferred from the transcriptome data, also underpinned their involvement in floral induction. The haplotypes identified will be highly useful to the pigeonpea breeding community for haplotype-based breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38819495What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.