ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2024
Towards cascading genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- TMEM106B is a selective modulator of TDP-43 pathology in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Contributions of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to advancing AD research: a targeted review of recent publications.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Genetic drivers of progression in Alzheimer's disease are distinct from disease risk.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Development of Highly Multiplex Targeted Proteomics Assays in Biofluids Using a Nominal Mass Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Evaluation of distinct and similar pathological features between diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Genetic drivers of progression in Alzheimer's disease are distinct from disease risk.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Polygenic pathways shape white matter vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease-related pathophysiological changes.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease in healthy aging: age-related and APOE-driven effects on brain structures and cognition.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Estimation of reference curves for brain atrophy and analysis of robustness to machine effects.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- APOE4 impact on soluble and insoluble tau pathology is mostly influenced by amyloid-β.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Milestone Review: The History of Molecular Genetics Analysis of Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Review
- Alzheimer's disease genetic pathways impact cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and imaging endophenotypes in non-demented individuals.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Disentangling genetic risks for development and progression of Alzheimer's disease.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease typically progresses in stages, which have been defined by the presence of disease-specific biomarkers: amyloid (A), tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N). This progression of biomarkers has been condensed into the ATN framework, in which each of the biomarkers can be either positive (+) or negative (-). Over the past decades, genome-wide association studies have implicated ∼90 different loci involved with the development of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Here, we investigate whether genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease contributes equally to the progression in different disease stages or whether it exhibits a stage-dependent effect. Amyloid (A) and tau (T) status was defined using a combination of available PET and CSF biomarkers in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. In 312 participants with biomarker-confirmed A-T- status, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the contribution of APOE and polygenic risk scores (beyond APOE) to convert to A+T- status (65 conversions). Furthermore, we repeated the analysis in 290 participants with A+T- status and investigated the genetic contribution to conversion to A+T+ (45 conversions). Both survival analyses were adjusted for age, sex and years of education. For progression from A-T- to A+T-, APOE-e4 burden showed a significant effect [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.70-4.89; P < 0.001], whereas polygenic risk did not (HR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84-1.42; P = 0.53). Conversely, for the transition from A+T- to A+T+, the contribution of APOE-e4 burden was reduced (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.05-2.51; P = 0.031), whereas the polygenic risk showed an increased contribution (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.27-2.36; P < 0.001). The marginal APOE effect was driven by e4 homozygotes (HR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.05-6.35; P = 0.039) as opposed to e4 heterozygotes (HR = 1.74; 95% CI: 0.87-3.49; P = 0.12). The genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease unfolds in a disease stage-dependent fashion. A better understanding of the interplay between disease stage and genetic risk can lead to a more mechanistic understanding of the transition between ATN stages and a better understanding of the molecular processes leading to Alzheimer's disease, in addition to opening therapeutic windows for targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.