Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38821942›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Representation of genomic intratumor heterogeneity in multi-region non-small cell lung cancer patient-derived xenograft models.

Robert E Hynds, Ariana Huebner, David R Pearce, Mark S Hill, Ayse U Akarca, David A Moore, Sophia Ward, Kate H C Gowers, Takahiro Karasaki, Maise Al Bakir and 27 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Organoids glimpse: the nexus for diverse tumor heterogeneity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Correlation of LOXL2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer with immunotherapy.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Robert E Hynds *Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. rob.hynds@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-8791
Ariana Huebner *Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-4999
David R Pearce *Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-2924
Mark S HillCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-8934
Ayse U AkarcaDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-3927
David A MooreCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-1312
Sophia WardCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6777-5279
Kate H C GowersLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Takahiro KarasakiCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-2360
Maise Al BakirCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-8332
Gareth A WilsonCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Oriol PichCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-1882
Carlos Martínez-RuizCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-0565
A S Md Mukarram HossainCancer Research UK National Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-8982
Simon P PearceCancer Research UK National Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-5538
Monica SivakumarCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Assma Ben AissaCancer Immunology Unit, Research Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Eva GrönroosCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8303-5409
Deepak ChandrasekharanLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3427-3926
Krishna K KolluriLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca TownsBiological Services Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Kaiwen WangSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Daniel E CookCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-562X
Leticia Bosshard-CarterCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Cristina Naceur-LombardelliCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7097-0307
Andrew J RowanCancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Selvaraju VeeriahCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Kevin LitchfieldCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3725-0914
Philip A J CrosbieCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Caroline DiveCancer Research UK National Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1726-8850
Sergio A QuezadaCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-1700
Sam M JanesLungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-5939
Mariam Jamal-HanjaniCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-1259
Teresa MarafiotiDepartment of Cellular Pathology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
TRACERx consortium
Nicholas McGranahanCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. nicholas.mcgranahan.10@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9537-4045
Charles SwantonCancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK. charles.swanton@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-3018

Funding

Cancer Research UK CTUQQR-DEC22/100009Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C11496/A17786Wellcome Trust CC2041Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) WT209199/Z/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used in cancer research. To investigate the genomic fidelity of non-small cell lung cancer PDX models, we established 48 PDX models from 22 patients enrolled in the TRACERx study. Multi-region tumor sampling increased successful PDX engraftment and most models were histologically similar to their parent tumor. Whole-exome sequencing enabled comparison of tumors and PDX models and we provide an adapted mouse reference genome for improved removal of NOD scid gamma (NSG) mouse-derived reads from sequencing data. PDX model establishment caused a genomic bottleneck, with models often representing a single tumor subclone. While distinct tumor subclones were represented in independent models from the same tumor, individual PDX models did not fully recapitulate intratumor heterogeneity. On-going genomic evolution in mice contributed modestly to the genomic distance between tumors and PDX models. Our study highlights the importance of considering primary tumor heterogeneity when using PDX models and emphasizes the benefit of comprehensive tumor sampling.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungGenetic HeterogeneityLung NeoplasmsMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDAgedAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalExome SequencingFemaleGenomicsHeterograftsHumansMaleMiceMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID38821942
PMCPMC11143323

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.