Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822324›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024

Digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients: the Cog-Tab-Age feasibility study.

Giulia Binarelli, Marie Lange, Mélanie Dos Santos, Mylène Duivon, Aurélie Capel, Marie Fernette, Antoine Boué, Jean-Michel Grellard, Laure Tron, Djihane Ahmed-Lecheheb and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04261153 (Use of Cognitive Stimulation Software for Patients Over the Age of 70 Followed for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04261153 nacompletednot on this map

Use of Cognitive Stimulation Software for Patients Over the Age of 70 Followed for Breast Cancer: COG-TAB-AGE Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Francois BaclesseRan2020 to 2024Enrolled55ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCognitive stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Giulia BinarelliClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Marie LangeClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France. m.lange@baclesse.unicancer.fr.
Mélanie Dos SantosClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Mylène DuivonClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Aurélie CapelClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Marie FernetteClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Antoine BouéClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Jean-Michel GrellardClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Laure TronCHU Grenoble Alpes, VOIRON, 38500, France.
Djihane Ahmed-LechehebANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, 14000, France.
Bénédicte ClarisseClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.
Olivier RigalCare Support Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Johan Le FelCare Support Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Florence JolyClinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, 14076, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly cancer patients often experience cognitive difficulties that can affect their quality of life and autonomy. However, they are rarely included in clinical trials, and only one study has explored the feasibility of cognitive training in this population. While digital cognitive training has been successful in improving cognition in younger patients, its feasibility in elderly patients requires evaluation.

objectivesThis feasibility study primarily focused on evaluating patients' ability to use digital cognitive stimulation (usability). Secondary objectives were to evaluate acceptability, adherence, and satisfaction with regard to digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients.

methodsElderly breast cancer patients at least 70 years old who were receiving cancer treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy) were recruited. Cognitive complaints were evaluated at baseline using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scale (FACT-Cog). Participants were invited to attend three 20-minute sessions of digital cognitive stimulation using HappyNeuron PRESCO software App on tablets, with the first session being supervised by a neuropsychologist and the two others being performed independently either at home or at the cancer center. We hypothesized that participants would spend 10 of the 20 min of the given time with the tablet completing exercises (training time). Thus, the usability of digital cognitive stimulation was defined as completing at least three exercises during the training time (10 min) of one of the two training sessions in autonomy. The proportion of patients who agreed to participate (acceptability) and completion of planned sessions (adherence) were also estimated. Satisfaction was evaluated post-intervention through a self-report questionnaire.

results240 patients were initially screened, 60% (n = 145) were eligible and 38% agreed to participate in the study. Included patients (n = 55) had a mean age of 73 ± 3 years, 96% an ECOG score of 0-1 and were undergoing radiotherapy (64%), and/or chemotherapy (47%) and/or targeted therapy (36%) for stage I-II breast cancer (79%). Most patients reported significant cognitive complaints (82%) and 55% had previous experience with digital tools (n = 30). The usability rate was 92%, with 46 out of 50 evaluable participants completing at least three exercises during the training time. The adherence rate was 88%, with 43/50 participants completing all planned sessions. Participants were largely satisfied with the cognitive intervention format (87%). They preferred to complete sessions at the cancer center under the supervision of the neuropsychologist than alone at home (90%).

conclusionsThe high level of usability, adherence and satisfaction in this study shows for the first time the feasibility of digital cognitive stimulation in cancer patients older than 70 years. However, the intervention should be proposed only to patients reporting cognitive complaints and should be structured and supervised to improve acceptability and adherence.

trial registrationClinicalTrials identifier: NCT04261153, registered on 07/02/2020.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMobile ApplicationsPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeBreast cancerCancer-related cognitive impairmentCognitive stimulationDigital interventionElderlyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38822324
PMCPMC11143679

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.