Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822398›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2024

Neuropathological lesions in intravenous BCG-stimulated K18-hACE2 mice challenged with SARS-CoV-2.

Lidia Sánchez-Morales, Néstor Porras, Teresa García-Seco, Marta Pérez-Sancho, Fátima Cruz, Blanca Chinchilla, Sandra Barroso-Arévalo, Marta Diaz-Frutos, Aránzazu Buendía, Inmaculada Moreno and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Complement system activation in wild boar (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Lidia Sánchez-Morales *VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Néstor Porras *VISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Teresa García-SecoVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Pérez-SanchoVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain. maperezs@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1493-8978
Fátima CruzVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Blanca ChinchillaVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Barroso-ArévaloVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Diaz-FrutosVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Aránzazu BuendíaVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada MorenoUnidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Carretera Pozuelo-Majadahonda km 2, Majadahonda, 28220, Madrid, Spain.
Víctor BrionesVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
María de Los Ángeles RisaldeDepartamento de Anatomía y Anatomía Patológica Comparadas y Toxicología, Grupo de Investigación en Sanidad Animal y Zoonosis (GISAZ), UIC Zoonosis y Enfermedades Emergentes (ENZOEM), Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
José de la FuenteSaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ramón JusteAnimal Health Department, NEIKER-Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Joseba GarridoAnimal Health Department, NEIKER-Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Ana BalseiroDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, 24071, León, Spain.
Christian GortázarSaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Antonio Rodríguez-BertosVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes DomínguezUnidad de Inmunología Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Carretera Pozuelo-Majadahonda km 2, Majadahonda, 28220, Madrid, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid PR38/21Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-112966RB-I00PID2020-112966RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, questions emerged about the potential effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the neurodegenerative diseases it may contribute to. To explore this, an experimental study was carried out in BCG-stimulated and non-stimulated k18-hACE2 mice challenged with SARS-CoV-2. Viral loads in tissues determined by RT-qPCR, histopathology in brain and lungs, immunohistochemical study in brain (IHC) as well as mortality rates, clinical signs and plasma inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers were assessed. Our results showed BCG-SARS-CoV-2 challenged mice presented higher viral loads in the brain and an increased frequency of neuroinvasion, with the greatest differences observed between groups at 3-4 days post-infection (dpi). Histopathological examination showed a higher severity of brain lesions in BCG-SARS-CoV-2 challenged mice, mainly consisting of neuroinflammation, increased glial cell population and neuronal degeneration, from 5 dpi onwards. This group also presented higher interstitial pneumonia and vascular thrombosis in lungs (3-4 dpi), BCG-SARS-CoV-2 mice showed higher values for TNF-α and D-dimer values, while iNOS values were higher in SARS-CoV-2 mice at 3-4 dpi. Results presented in this study indicate that BCG stimulation could have intensified the inflammatory and neurodegenerative lesions promoting virus neuroinvasion and dissemination in this experimental model. Although k18-hACE2 mice show higher hACE2 expression and neurodissemination, this study suggests that, although the benefits of BCG on enhancing heterologous protection against pathogens and tumour cells have been broadly demonstrated, potential adverse outcomes due to the non-specific effects of BCG should be considered.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineBrainCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsFemaleLungMiceMice, TransgenicViral LoadAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2BCG VaccineBCG stimulationK18-hACE2neuroinvasionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38822398
PMCPMC11143641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.