ReviewJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024
Xanomeline-Trospium in schizophrenia: A detailed review and comparison with the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's analysis.
Review in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-Clozapine interventions in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Xanomeline-Trospium Validates Muscarinic Agonism as an Effective Non-Dopaminergic Treatment for Schizophrenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Budget impact of xanomeline and trospium chloride for the treatment of adults with schizophrenia in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Beyond dopamine: KarXT and emerging mechanism-based therapies in schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- From dopamine to muscarine: xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) as a novel direction in the psychopharmacotherapy of schizophrenia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.