Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826675›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Probing latent brain dynamics in Alzheimer's disease via recurrent neural network.

Tong Li, Jiang Wang, Shanshan Li, Kai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Dynamics of interaction betweenCognitive neurodynamics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tong LiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Jiang WangSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Shanshan LiSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Educations, Tianjin, China.
Kai LiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impairment of cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is clearly correlated to abnormal changes in cortical rhythm. However, the mechanisms underlying this correlation are still poorly understood. Here, we investigate how network structure and dynamical characteristics alter their abnormal changes in cortical rhythm. To that end, biological data of AD and normal participates are collected. By extracting the energy characteristics of different sub-bands in EEG signals, we find that the rhythm of AD patients is special particularly in theta and alpha bands. The cortical rhythm of normal state is mainly at alpha band, while that of AD state shift to the theta band. Furthermore, recurrent neural network (RNN) is trained to explore the rhythm formation and transformation between two neural states from the perspective view of neurocomputation. It is found that the neural coupling strength decreases significantly under AD state when compared with normal state, which weakens the ability of information transmission in AD state. Besides, the low-dimensional properties of RNN are obtained. By analyzing the relationship between the cortical rhythm transition and the low-dimensional trajectory, it is concluded that the low-dimensional trajectory update is slower and the communication cost is higher in AD state, which explains the abnormal synchronization of AD brain network. Our work reveals the causes for the formation of abnormal brain synchronous functional network status, which may expand our understanding of the mechanism of cognitive impairment in AD and provide an EEG biomarker for early AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseDynamicsMechanismRNN

Identifiers

PMID38826675
PMCPMC11143160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.