Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38826977›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Deep Learning Approaches for Medical Image Analysis and Diagnosis.

Gopal Kumar Thakur, Abhishek Thakur, Shridhar Kulkarni, Naseebia Khan, Shahnawaz Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gopal Kumar ThakurDepartment of Data Sciences, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, USA.
Abhishek ThakurDepartment of Data Sciences, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, USA.
Shridhar KulkarniDepartment of Data Sciences, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, USA.
Naseebia KhanDepartment of Data Sciences, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, USA.
Shahnawaz KhanDepartment of Computer Application, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to enhancing diagnostic accuracy, deep learning techniques offer the potential to streamline workflows, reduce interpretation time, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. The scalability and adaptability of deep learning algorithms enable their deployment across diverse clinical settings, ranging from radiology departments to point-of-care facilities. Furthermore, ongoing research efforts focus on addressing the challenges of data heterogeneity, model interpretability, and regulatory compliance, paving the way for seamless integration of deep learning solutions into routine clinical practice. As the field continues to evolve, collaborations between clinicians, data scientists, and industry stakeholders will be paramount in harnessing the full potential of deep learning for advancing medical image analysis and diagnosis. Furthermore, the integration of deep learning algorithms with other technologies, including natural language processing and computer vision, may foster multimodal medical data analysis and clinical decision support systems to improve patient care. The future of deep learning in medical image analysis and diagnosis is promising. With each success and advancement, this technology is getting closer to being leveraged for medical purposes. Beyond medical image analysis, patient care pathways like multimodal imaging, imaging genomics, and intelligent operating rooms or intensive care units can benefit from deep learning models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical practicemachine learningmedical imagingreliability

Identifiers

PMID38826977
PMCPMC11144045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.