Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38828464›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2024

Hypertensive crisis and its predictors in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis, 2024.

Ousman Adal, Natnael Kebede, Amare Mebrat Delie, Eyob Ketema Bogale, Tadele Fentabil Anagaw, Misganaw Guadie Tiruneh, Eneyew Talie Fenta, Destaw Endeshaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lived experience of people with hypertension in Ethiopia: A phenomenological study, 2025.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ousman AdalDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia.
Natnael KebedeDepartment of Health Promotion, School of Public Health College of Medicine Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie City, MSc, Ethiopia.
Amare Mebrat DelieDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Injibara University, Injibara City, MSc, Ethiopia.
Eyob Ketema BogaleHealth Promotion and Behavioral Science Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar City, MSc, Ethiopia.
Tadele Fentabil AnagawHealth Promotion and Behavioral Science Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar City, MSc, Ethiopia.
Misganaw Guadie TirunehDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar City, MSc, Ethiopia.
Eneyew Talie FentaDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Injibara University, Injibara City, MSc, Ethiopia.
Destaw EndeshawDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar City, MSc, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertensive crises are a leading cause of visits to emergency departments, carrying grave health implications. A significant number of patients presenting with these crises have a known history of hypertension. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the combined prevalence of hypertensive crises among individuals with either a history of hypertension or unknown status (newly diagnosed with a hypertensive crisis). Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Research databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Africa Index Medicus, Science Direct, HINARI, and Google Scholar, were systematically searched. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while publication bias was explored through Egger's regression test, funnel plots, and sensitivity analyses. Data collection adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) format. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA version 17, employing the random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model. Results: Amongst the 15 studies analyzed, the application of the random-effects DerSimonian-Laird statistical model indicated that the prevalence of hypertensive crisis was determined to be 9.09 %, with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) ranging from 7.41 % to 10.77 %. Factors such as poor medication adherence (POR 5.00; 95 % CI: 3.61, 6.93), patients with comorbidities (POR 4.73; 95 % CI: 3.29, 6.80), patients with a history of hypertension (POR 5.64; 95 % CI: 4.57, 6.94), patients aged >65 (POR 2.77; 95 % CI: 2.16, 6.59), and excessive alcohol intake (POR 5.01; 95 % CI: 3.82, 6.58) were associated with higher odds of hypertensive crisis. Conclusion: The findings indicate a markedly higher incidence of hypertensive crisis among hospital-presenting patients in Africa. Factors such as medication non-adherence, co-existing comorbidities, historical hypertension, being over 65, and alcohol misuse significantly contribute to this condition. These insights call for a comprehensive healthcare strategy that targets both the management of hypertension and its complications, aiming to improve the overall health outcomes of affected patients.

Indexed as

AfricaHypertensive crisisHypertensive emergencyHypertensive urgency

Identifiers

PMID38828464
PMCPMC11141447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.