Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38829518›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Comparative transcriptome profile of embryos at different developmental stages derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).

Deepak Kumar, Manish Tiwari, Pallavi Goel, Manoj Kumar Singh, Naresh Lala Selokar, Prabhat Palta

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Mammalian Oocyte: A Central Hub for Cellular Reprogramming and Stemness.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deepak KumarICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-9278
Manish TiwariICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India. bt.manish1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0684-5321
Pallavi GoelICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Manoj Kumar SinghICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Naresh Lala SelokarICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India.
Prabhat PaltaICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India. prabhatpalta@yahoo.com.

Funding

DST-SERB 4001/511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a very important reproductive technology with many diverse applications, such as fast multiplication of elite animals, the production of transgenic animals and embryonic stem (ES) cells. However, low cloning efficiency, a low live birth rate and the abnormally high incidence of abnormalities in the offspring born are attributed to incomplete or aberrant nuclear reprogramming. In SCNT embryos, the aberrant expression pattern of the genes throughout embryonic development is responsible for the incomplete nuclear reprogramming. The present study was carried out to identify the differential gene expression (DEGs) profile and molecular pathways of the SCNT and IVF embryos at different developmental stages (2 cell, 8 cell and blastocyst stages). In the present study, 1164 (2 cell), 1004 (8 cell) and 530 (blastocyst stage) DEGs were identified in the SCNT embryos as compared to IVF embryos. In addition, several genes such as ZEB1, GDF1, HSF5, PDE3B, VIM, TNNC, HSD3B1, TAGLN, ITGA4 and AGMAT were affecting the development of SCNT embryos as compared to IVF embryos. Further, Gene Ontology (GO) and molecular pathways analysis suggested, SCNT embryos exhibit variations compared to their IVF counterparts and affected the development of embryos throughout the different developmental stages. Apart from this, q-PCR analysis of the GDF1, TMEM114, and IGSF22 genes were utilized to validate the RNA-seq data. These findings contribute valuable insights about the different genes and molecular pathways underlying SCNT embryo development and offer crucial information for improving SCNT efficiency.

Indexed as

BuffaloesFertilization in VitroNuclear Transfer TechniquesTranscriptomeAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalDevelopmental stagesDifferentially expressed genes (DEGs)EmbryosGene ontologyIn-vitro fertilization (IVF)Molecular pathwaysSomatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)Transcriptome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.