Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38830760›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Afrose Dor, Corin Harrison, Sarosh R Irani, Adam Al-Diwani, John Grogan, Sanjay Manohar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Afrose DorNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom afrose.dor@gmail.com sanjay.manohar@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-0551
Corin HarrisonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.
Sarosh R IraniNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Adam Al-DiwaniNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
John GroganTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Sanjay ManoharNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom afrose.dor@gmail.com sanjay.manohar@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P00878X/1Medical Research Council MR/V007173/1Medical Research Council MR/V036858/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) may be crucial to working memory (WM). Computational models predict that they sustain neural firing and produce associative memory, which may underpin maintaining and binding information, respectively. We test this in patients with antibodies to NMDAR (

Indexed as

Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor EncephalitisAttentionMemory, Short-TermAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateYoung AdultReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateN-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-antibody encephalitisworking memory

Identifiers

PMID38830760
PMCPMC11236588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.