Evidence mapPaperPMID 38831091Full record

SynthesisHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.

Yukako Ogoyama, Makiko Abe, Keisuke Okamura, Kazuhiro Tada, Kenichi Katsurada, Shigeru Shibata, Hisashi Kai, Hiromi Rakugi, Koichi Node, Hiroyoshi Yokoi and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  6. The JSH Morning Hypertension Eradication Program Project.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yukako Ogoyama *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Makiko Abe *Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Keisuke OkamuraDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Center, Imamura Hospital, Tosu, Saga, Japan.
Kazuhiro TadaDivision of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kenichi KatsuradaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Shigeru ShibataDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisashi KaiDepartment of Cardiology, Kurume University Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiromi RakugiDivision of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Koichi NodeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Hiroyoshi YokoiCardiovascular Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazuomi KarioDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan. kkario@jichi.ac.jp.
Hisatomi ArimaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan. harima@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHypertensionKidneySympathectomyBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeHypertensionMeta-analysisRenal denervationSham Procedure

Identifiers

PMID38831091

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.