Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38831762›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Using artificial intelligence and predictive modelling to enable learning healthcare systems (LHS) for pandemic preparedness.

Anshu Ankolekar, Lisanne Eppings, Fabio Bottari, Inês Freitas Pinho, Kit Howard, Rebecca Baker, Yang Nan, Xiaodan Xing, Simon Lf Walsh, Wim Vos and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on multicultural families with food allergy.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anshu AnkolekarDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Lisanne EppingsDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Fabio BottariRadiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liege, Belgium.
Inês Freitas PinhoRadiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liege, Belgium.
Kit HowardCDISC, Austin, TX, United States.
Rebecca BakerCDISC, Austin, TX, United States.
Yang NanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xiaodan XingNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon Lf WalshNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wim VosRadiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liege, Belgium.
Guang YangNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In anticipation of potential future pandemics, we examined the challenges and opportunities presented by the COVID-19 outbreak. This analysis highlights how artificial intelligence (AI) and predictive models can support both patients and clinicians in managing subsequent infectious diseases, and how legislators and policymakers could support these efforts, to bring learning healthcare system (LHS) from guidelines to real-world implementation. This report chronicles the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the diverse data sets generated throughout its course. We propose strategies for harnessing this data via AI and predictive modelling to enhance the functioning of LHS. The challenges faced by patients and healthcare systems around the world during this unprecedented crisis could have been mitigated with an informed and timely adoption of the three pillars of the LHS: Knowledge, Data and Practice. By harnessing AI and predictive analytics, we can develop tools that not only detect potential pandemic-prone diseases early on but also assist in patient management, provide decision support, offer treatment recommendations, deliver patient outcome triage, predict post-recovery long-term disease impacts, monitor viral mutations and variant emergence, and assess vaccine and treatment efficacy in real-time. A patient-centric approach remains paramount, ensuring patients are both informed and actively involved in disease mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData HarmonizationExplainable AILearning Healthcare SystemsPredictive Modeling

Identifiers

PMID38831762
PMCPMC11145382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.