ArticleCureus2024
Sympathetic Overactivity and Parasympathetic Impairment in Type 2 Diabetes: An Analysis of Cardiovascular Autonomic Functions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Impact of PKC-MAPK Signaling on Cardiac Sympathetic Overactivation in Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Assessing the Impact of BMI and Glycaemic Control on Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy in Patients with Early and Long-standing Diabetes Mellitus: A Window of Opportunity.Annals of neurosciences · 2025Review
- Downregulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) within the paraventricular nucleus in Ins2Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2025Article
- Remodeling of the Intracardiac Ganglia During the Development of Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Evaluating Blood Pressure Variability in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Insight into Non-Dipping Patterns and Their Clinical Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular autonomic dysregulation is a known complication of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), characterized by dysregulation in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). These disruptions in cardiovascular autonomic control can significantly influence the morbidity and mortality associated with the disease. Objectives This study aims to investigate how T2DM affects cardiovascular autonomic functions by comparing responses in HR, BP, and specific autonomic function tests between a control group without diabetes and a study group with diabetes. The research questions focus on assessing HR variability, baroreflex sensitivity, and other autonomic parameters to determine the extent of cardiovascular autonomic dysregulation in diabetic patients. Methods This cross-sectional study involved 200 adults, divided equally between a control group (n = 100) and a T2DM study group (n = 100). The exclusion criteria included cardiovascular diseases and renal impairment. Data collection involved assessing baseline characteristics such as age and BMI. Cardiovascular measures, including HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), were recorded after a five-minute rest. Autonomic function tests assessed sympathetic and parasympathetic responses, including the cold pressor test and the isometric hand grip exercise test. The statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), focusing on independent t-tests to compare between groups, considering p-values <0.05 as significant. Potential confounding variables like age and BMI were accounted for in the analysis to ensure robust findings Results The study group showed a higher average BMI (28.95 ± 5.60) compared to the control group (26.50 ± 5.70) and an increased resting HR (74.20 ± 8.60 bpm vs. 69.30 ± 9.10 bpm). The SBP was slightly higher in the study group (115.00 ± 19.00 mmHg vs. 114.50 ± 8.90 mmHg), while the DBP was lower (71.50 ± 10.70 mmHg vs. 72.80 ± 6.70 mmHg). The autonomic function tests showed a smaller increase in SBP (106.80 ± 11.00 mmHg) and a larger increase in DBP (75.90 ± 8.30 mmHg) upon standing in the study group compared to controls. The cold pressor test indicated increased sympathetic activity in the study group, with significant rises in SBP (133.70 ± 10.30 mmHg) and DBP (83.40 ± 9.00 mmHg) compared to the control group (SBP: 114.31 ± 11.87 mmHg, DBP: 71.85 ± 8.67 mmHg). These findings demonstrate marked differences in cardiovascular autonomic responses between the groups. Conclusions This study demonstrates that T2DM significantly impacts cardiovascular autonomic functions, with diabetic patients showing altered HR and BP indicative of increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity. These autonomic dysfunctions may heighten cardiovascular risk in diabetic individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of monitoring and managing cardiovascular autonomic functions in diabetic patients to reduce their risk of cardiovascular complications. Further research should investigate the underlying mechanisms and the effectiveness of interventions to improve autonomic function in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.