Post-contrast CT liver attenuation alone is superior to the liver-spleen difference for identifying moderate hepatic steatosis.

objectiveTo assess the diagnostic performance of post-contrast CT for predicting moderate hepatic steatosis in an older adult cohort undergoing a uniform CT protocol, utilizing hepatic and splenic attenuation values. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 1676 adults (mean age, 68.4 ± 10.2 years; 1045M/631F) underwent a CT urothelial protocol that included unenhanced, portal venous, and 10-min delayed phases through the liver and spleen. Automated hepatosplenic segmentation for attenuation values (in HU) was performed using a validated deep-learning tool. Unenhanced liver attenuation < 40.0 HU, corresponding to > 15% MRI-based proton density fat, served as the reference standard for moderate steatosis.

resultsThe prevalence of moderate or severe steatosis was 12.9% (216/1676). The diagnostic performance of portal venous liver HU in predicting moderate hepatic steatosis (AUROC = 0.943) was significantly better than the liver-spleen HU difference (AUROC = 0.814) (p < 0.001). Portal venous phase liver thresholds of 80 and 90 HU had a sensitivity/specificity for moderate steatosis of 85.6%/89.6%, and 94.9%/74.7%, respectively, whereas a liver-spleen difference of -40 HU and -10 HU had a sensitivity/specificity of 43.5%/90.0% and 92.1%/52.5%, respectively. Furthermore, livers with moderate-severe steatosis demonstrated significantly less post-contrast enhancement (mean, 35.7 HU vs 47.3 HU; p < 0.001).

conclusionModerate steatosis can be reliably diagnosed on standard portal venous phase CT using liver attenuation values alone. Consideration of splenic attenuation appears to add little value. Moderate steatosis not only has intrinsically lower pre-contrast liver attenuation values (< 40 HU), but also enhances less, typically resulting in post-contrast liver attenuation values of 80 HU or less. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Moderate steatosis can be reliably diagnosed on post-contrast CT using liver attenuation values alone. Livers with at least moderate steatosis enhance less than those with mild or no steatosis, which combines with the lower intrinsic attenuation to improve detection. KEY POINTS: The liver-spleen attenuation difference is frequently utilized in routine practice but appears to have performance limitations. The liver-spleen attenuation difference is less effective than liver attenuation for moderate steatosis. Moderate and severe steatosis can be identified on standard portal venous phase CT using liver attenuation alone.