Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38834909›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Constructing a prognostic model for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases after preoperative chemotherapy: a study based on SEER and an external validation cohort.

Yixin Ding, Xiaoxi Han, Shufen Zhao, Shasha Wang, Jing Guo, Chuanyu Leng, Xiangxue Li, Kongjia Wang, Wensheng Qiu, Weiwei Qi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yixin Ding *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaoxi Han *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shufen ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shasha WangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jing GuoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Chuanyu LengDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiangxue LiDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Kongjia WangDepartment of Urology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wensheng Qiu *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. wsqiuqdfy@qdu.edu.cn.
Weiwei Qi *Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China. qwwdz@qdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6608-2799

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Medical Development Foundation No. KC2021-JX-0186-145Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation No. Y-BMS2019-038Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Shandong Province No. 202003030451The Youth Scientific Research Fund of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University No. QDFYQN202101007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of preoperative chemotherapy and surgical treatment has been shown to significantly enhance the prognosis of colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) patients. Nevertheless, as a result of variations in clinicopathological parameters, the prognosis of this particular group of patients differs considerably. This study aimed to develop and evaluate Cox proportional risk regression model and competing risk regression model using two patient cohorts. The goal was to provide a more precise and personalized prognostic evaluation system.

methodsWe collected information on individuals who had a pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. We obtained data from patients who underwent pathological diagnosis of colorectal cancer and got comprehensive therapy at the hospital between January 1, 2010, and June 1, 2022. The SEER data collected after screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria were separated into two cohorts: a training cohort (training cohort) and an internal validation cohort (internal validation cohort), using a random 1:1 split. Subgroup Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analyses were conducted on each of the three groups. The data that received following screening from the hospital were designated as the external validation cohort. The subsequent variables were chosen for additional examination: age, gender, marital status, race, tumor site, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor size, T stage, N stage, pathological grade, number of tumor deposits, perineural invasion, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive regional lymph nodes. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). In the training cohort, we conducted univariate Cox regression analysis and utilized a stepwise regression approach, employing the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to select variables and create Cox proportional risk regression models. We evaluated the accuracy of the model using calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under curve (AUC). The effectiveness of the models was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA). To evaluate the non-cancer-related outcomes, we analyzed variables that had significant impacts using subgroup cumulative incidence function (CIF) and Gray's test. These analyses were used to create competing risk regression models. Nomograms of the two models were constructed separately and prognostic predictions were made for the same patients in SEER database.

resultsThis study comprised a total of 735 individuals. The mOS of the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and QDU cohort was 55.00 months (95%CI 46.97-63.03), 48.00 months (95%CI 40.65-55.35), and 68.00 months (95%CI 54.91-81.08), respectively. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, N stage, presence of perineural infiltration, number of tumor deposits and number of positive regional lymph nodes were identified as independent prognostic risk variables (p < 0.05). In comparison to the conventional TNM staging model, the Cox proportional risk regression model exhibited a higher C-index. After controlling for competing risk events, age, N stage, presence of perineural infiltration, number of tumor deposits, number of regional lymph nodes examined, and number of positive regional lymph nodes were independent predictors of the risk of cancer-specific mortality (p < 0.05).

conclusionWe have developed a prognostic model to predict the survival of patients with synchronous CRLM who undergo preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. This model has been tested internally and externally, confirming its accuracy and reliability.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsSEER ProgramAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurvePreoperative chemotherapyPrognosisRisk modelSynchronous CRLM

Identifiers

PMID38834909
PMCPMC11564222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.