ArticleCancer management and research2024
Predictive Value of the Total Bilirubin and CA50 Screened Based on Machine Learning for Recurrence of Bladder Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI predicting recurrence in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: systematic review with study strengths and weaknesses.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of a multi-center prognostic model for predicting survival in non-small cell lung cancer using pulmonary and hematological data.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Recurrence is the main factor for poor prognosis of bladder cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new biomarkers to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer. In this study, we used machine learning (ML) methods based on a variety of clinical variables to screen prognostic biomarkers of bladder cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 345 bladder cancer patients were participated in this retrospective study and randomly divided into training and testing group. We used five supervised clustering ML algorithms: decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to obtained prediction information through 34 clinical parameters. Results: By comparing five ML algorithms, we found that total bilirubin (TBIL) and CA50 had the best performance in predicting the recurrence of bladder cancer. In addition, the combined predictive performance of the two is superior to the performance of any single indicator prediction. Conclusion: ML technology can evaluate the recurrence of bladder cancer. This study shows that the combination of TBIL and CA50 can improve the prognosis prediction of bladder cancer recurrence, which can help clinicians make decisions and develop personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.