Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835486›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Ning Li, Haiyang Wang, Huan Pei, Yueying Wu, Lei Li, Yu Ren, Si Wang, Yuan Ma, Miao Luo, Jiali Yuan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The gut-bone-inflammation axis: intestinal barrier disruption as a central driver of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Dysbiosis in the Gut-Liver Axis Is Associated With Low Bone Mass During Murine Cholestasis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ning Li *First Clinical Medical College, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
Haiyang Wang *First Clinical Medical College, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
Huan Pei *Key Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Yueying WuKey Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Lei LiKey Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Yu RenKey Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Si WangFirst Clinical Medical College, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
Yuan MaThe Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Miao LuoKunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
Jiali YuanKey Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Lvyu LiKunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
Dongdong QinKey Laboratory of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.

Funding

The Role of the Tau in Homeostatic Scaling and Mechanisms of Alzheimer's DiseaseK08AG070053 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, MEAGHAN O'MALLEY · 2021 to 2025
$827k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG070053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the gut microbiota and osteoporosis combining Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis with animal experiments. Methods: We conducted an analysis on the relationship between differential bacteria and osteoporosis using open-access genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on gut microbe and osteoporosis obtained from public databases. The analysis was performed using two-sample MR analysis, and the causal relationship was examined through inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Bilateral oophorectomy was employed to replicate the mouse osteoporosis model, which was assessed by micro computed tomography (CT), pathological tests, and bone transformation indexes. Additionally, 16S rDNA sequencing was conducted on fecal samples, while SIgA and indexes of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α inflammatory factors were examined in colon samples. Through immunofluorescence and histopathology, expression levels of tight junction proteins, such as claudin-1, ZO-1, and occludin, were assessed, and conduct correlation analysis on differential bacteria and related environmental factors were performed. Results: A positive correlation was observed between Conclusion:

Indexed as

16S rDNAanimal model validationg_RuminococcusMendelian randomizationmicrobiota-gut-bone axiso_Burkjolderialesosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38835486
PMCPMC11148449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.