Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38835671›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024

Does intervention engagement mediate physical activity change in a web-based computer-tailored physical activity intervention?-Secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.

Corneel Vandelanotte, Camille E Short, Ronald C Plotnikoff, Stephanie Schoeppe, Stephanie J Alley, Quyen To, Amanda L Rebar, Mitch J Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corneel VandelanottePhysical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Camille E ShortMelbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Science and Melbourne School of Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ronald C PlotnikoffCentre of Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Stephanie SchoeppePhysical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Stephanie J AlleyPhysical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Quyen ToPhysical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Amanda L RebarPhysical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Mitch J DuncanCentre of Active Living and Learning, College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between intervention engagement and behaviour change may vary depending on the specific engagement metric being examined. To counter this composite engagement measures may provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between engagement and behaviour change, though few studies have applied such multidimensional engagement metrics. The aim of this secondary analysis of RCT data was to examine how a composite engagement score mediates the effect of a web-based computer-tailored physical activity intervention. Methods: 501 inactive Australian adults were randomised to a no-treatment control or intervention group. Intervention participants received 8 sessions of web-based personalised physical activity advice over a 12-week intervention period and the ability to complete action plans. Change in physical activity was assessed using Actigraph accelerometers at baseline, 3-months and 9-months. Engagement with the intervention (i.e., a composite score including frequency, intensity, duration and type) was continuously assessed during the intervention period using website tracking software and database metrics. Generalised structural equation models were used to examine how a composite engagement score mediated intervention effects at 3 months and 9 months. Results: At 3 months, mediation analysis revealed that the intervention group had significantly higher engagement scores than the control group [a-path exp(b) = 6.462, 95% CI = 5.121-7.804, Discussion: The findings suggest that a composite intervention engagement score has a small positive influence on physical activity changes and that other factors (e.g., behaviour change techniques) are likely to be more important drivers of behaviour change.

Indexed as

eHealthexerciseinternetintervention usageonlinetailoredvideo

Identifiers

PMID38835671
PMCPMC11148347

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.