ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Time-Resolved Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography for Retinal Blood Flow Analysis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence That Cardiac Pulse Strains Retinal Vessels in and near the Optic Disc During Ocular Ductions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-Time High-Resolution OCT for Imaging Retinal and Choroidal Blood Flow.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Pilot study: non-invasive binocular fundal pulsation measurements using infrared photorefraction.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Heart-retina time analysis using electrocardiogram-coupled time-resolved dynamic optical coherence tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) representations in clinical practice are static and do not allow for a dynamic visualization and quantification of blood flow. This study aims to present a method to analyze retinal blood flow dynamics using time-resolved structural OCT. Methods: We developed novel imaging protocols to acquire video-rate time-resolved OCT B-scans (1024 × 496 pixels, 10 degrees field of view) at four different sensor integration times (integration time of 44.8 µs at a nominal A-scan rate of 20 kHz, 22.4 µs at 40 kHz, 11.2 µs at 85 kHz, and 7.24 µs at 125 kHz). The vessel centers were manually annotated for each B-scan and surrounding subvolumes were extracted. We used a velocity model based on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) drops due to fringe washout to calculate blood flow velocity profiles in vessels within five optic disc diameters of the optic disc rim. Results: Time-resolved dynamic structural OCT revealed pulsatile SNR changes in the analyzed vessels and allowed the calculation of potential blood flow velocities at all integration times. Fringe washout was stronger in acquisitions with longer integration times; however, the ratio of the average SNR to the peak SNR inside the vessel was similar across all integration times. Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of estimating blood flow profiles based on fringe washout analysis, showing pulsatile dynamics in vessels close to the optic nerve head using structural OCT. Time-resolved dynamic OCT has the potential to uncover valuable blood flow information in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.