Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839063›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2024

Toward Alleviating Clinician Documentation Burden: A Scoping Review of Burden Reduction Efforts.

Elizabeth A Sloss, Shawna Abdul, Mayfair A Aboagyewah, Alicia Beebe, Kathleen Kendle, Kyle Marshall, S Trent Rosenbloom, Sarah Rossetti, Aaron Grigg, Kevin D Smith and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safeguarding Neural Data.Neurology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Behavioral Health in Independently Owned Family Medicine Practices.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth A SlossDivision of Health Systems and Community Based Care, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Utah, United States.
Shawna AbdulJohn D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Mayfair A AboagyewahCase Management, Mount Sinai Health System, MSH Main Campus, New York, New York, United States.
Alicia BeebeSaint Luke's Health System (MO), Kansas City, Missouri, United States.
Kathleen KendleSection of Health Informatics, El Paso VA Health Care System, El Paso, Texas, United States.
Kyle MarshallDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, United States.
S Trent RosenbloomDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Sarah RossettiBiomedical Informatics and Nursing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
Aaron GriggDepartment of Informatics, Grande Ronde Hospital, La Grande, Oregon, United States.
Kevin D SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Rebecca G MishurisDigital, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer, Caregiving and End-of-Life CareT32NR013456 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A, MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown that documentation burden experienced by clinicians may lead to less direct patient care, increased errors, and job dissatisfaction. Implementing effective strategies within health care systems to mitigate documentation burden can result in improved clinician satisfaction and more time spent with patients. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding evidence-based interventions to reduce documentation burden.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to identify and comprehensively summarize the state of the science related to documentation burden reduction efforts.

methodsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, we searched gray literature and used Google Scholar to ensure a thorough review. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review, with a third reviewer resolving any discrepancies. Data extraction was performed and a table of evidence was created.

resultsA total of 34 articles were included in the review, published between 2016 and 2022, with a majority focusing on the United States. The efforts described can be categorized into medical scribes, workflow improvements, educational interventions, user-driven approaches, technology-based solutions, combination approaches, and other strategies. The outcomes of these efforts often resulted in improvements in documentation time, workflow efficiency, provider satisfaction, and patient interactions.

conclusionThis scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of health system documentation burden reduction efforts. The positive outcomes reported in the literature emphasize the potential effectiveness of these efforts. However, more research is needed to identify universally applicable best practices, and considerations should be given to the transfer of burden among members of the health care team, quality of education, clinician involvement, and evaluation methods.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDocumentationHumans

Identifiers

PMID38839063
PMCPMC11152769

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.