Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839521›Full record

ArticleVaccine2024

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered in the 2023 autumnal campaigns in Europe: Results from the VEBIS primary care test-negative design study, September 2023-January 2024.

Charlotte Laniece Delaunay, Aryse Melo, Marine Maurel, Clara Mazagatos, Luise Goerlitz, Joan O'Donnell, Beatrix Oroszi, Noémie Sève, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Iván Martínez-Baz and 21 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Charlotte Laniece DelaunayEpiconcept, Paris, France.
Aryse MeloNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza Virus and Other Respiratory Visuses, Infectious disease department - National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marine MaurelEpiconcept, Paris, France.
Clara MazagatosNational Centre of Epidemiology, CIBERESP, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Luise GoerlitzRobert Koch institute, Berlin, Germany.
Joan O'DonnellHealth Service Executive-Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Beatrix OrosziNational Laboratory for Health Security, Epidemiology and Surveillance Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Noémie SèveSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), Paris, France.
Ana Paula RodriguesEpidemiology department, National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Iván Martínez-BazInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra - IdiSNA - CIBERESP, Pamplona, Spain.
Adam MeijerNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Ivan MlinarićCroatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Neus Latorre-MargalefPublic Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mihaela LazărCantacuzino National Military Medical Institute for Research and Development, Bucharest, Romania.
Gloria Pérez-GimenoNational Centre of Epidemiology, CIBERESP, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Ralf DürrwaldNational Reference Centre for Influenza, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Charlene BennettUCD-National Virus Reference Laboratory, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gergő TúriNational Laboratory for Health Security, Epidemiology and Surveillance Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Marie-Anne Rameix-WeltiCentre National de Référence Virus des Infections Respiratoire (CNR VIR), Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Saclay, Université de Versailles St. Quentin, Université Paris Cité, UMR 1173 (2I), INSERM, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Raquel GuiomarNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza Virus and Other Respiratory Visuses, Infectious disease department - National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jesús CastillaInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra - IdiSNA - CIBERESP, Pamplona, Spain.
Mariëtte HooiveldNivel, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sanja Kurečić FilipovićCroatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tove Samuelsson HageyPublic Health Agency of Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.
Frederika DijkstraNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Vitor BorgesBioinformatics Unit, Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal.
Violeta Ramos MarínServicio de Epidemiología de la Consejería de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales de Ceuta, Ceuta, Spain.
Sabrina BacciEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marlena KaczmarekEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Esther KisslingEpiconcept, Paris, France. Electronic address: e.kissling@epiconcept.fr.
European primary care VE group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In autumn 2023, European vaccination campaigns predominantly administered XBB.1.5 vaccine. In a European multicentre study, we estimated 2023 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic infection at primary care level between September 2023 and January 2024. Using a test-negative case-control design, we estimated VE in the target group for COVID-19 vaccination overall and by time since vaccination. We included 1057 cases and 4397 controls. Vaccine effectiveness was 40 % (95 % CI: 26-53 %) overall, 48 % (95 % CI: 31-61 %) among those vaccinated < 6 weeks of onset and 29 % (95 % CI: 3-49 %) at 6-14 weeks. Our results suggest that COVID-19 vaccines administered to target groups during the autumn 2023 campaigns showed clinically significant effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed, medically attended symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 3 months following vaccination. A longer study period will allow for further variant-specific COVID-19 VE estimates, better understanding decline in VE and informing booster administration policies.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPrimary Health CareSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyAdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMiddle AgedVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19EuropeMulticentre studySARS-CoV-2Test-negative designVaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID38839521
PMCPMC11252666

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.