Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38839838›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Real-time predictive model of extrauterine growth retardation in preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks.

Liang Gao, Wei Shen, Fan Wu, Jian Mao, Ling Liu, Yan-Mei Chang, Rong Zhang, Xiu-Zhen Ye, Yin-Ping Qiu, Li Ma and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Liang Gao *Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, Fujian, China.
Wei Shen *Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, Fujian, China.
Fan WuDepartment of Neonatology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Jian MaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110000, China.
Ling LiuDepartment of Neonatology, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital and Guiyang Children's Hospital, Guiyang, 550000, China.
Yan-Mei ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China.
Rong ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, Pediatric Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200001, China.
Xiu-Zhen YeDepartment of Neonatology, Guangdong Province Maternal and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
Yin-Ping QiuDepartment of Neonatology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750000, China.
Li MaDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
Rui ChengDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Hui WuDepartment of Neonatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130000, China.
Dong-Mei ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Quanzhou Maternity and Children's Hospital, Fujian, 362000, Quanzhou, China.
Ling ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei, China.
Ping XuDepartment of Neonatology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, Shandong, China.
Hua MeiDepartment of Neonatology, The Affiliate Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010010, Inner Mongolia, China.
San-Nan WangDepartment of Neonatology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, 215002, Jiangsu, China.
Fa-Lin XuDepartment of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China.
Rong JuDepartment of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Chengdu Women' and Children's Central Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, Sichuan, China.
Zhi ZhengDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, Fujian, China.
Xin-Zhu LinDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361000, Fujian, China. xinzhufj@163.com.
Xiao-Mei TongDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100000, China. tongxm2007@126.com.
Chinese Multicenter EUGR Collaborative Group

Funding

Guidance Project of Xiamen Science and Technology Plan 3502Z20199139Guidance Project of Xiamen Science and Technology Plan 3502Z20214ZD1225Guidance Project of Xiamen Science and Technology Plan 3502Z20214ZD1232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a real-time risk prediction model for extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR). A total of 2514 very preterm infants were allocated into a training set and an external validation set. The most appropriate independent variables were screened using univariate analysis and Lasso regression with tenfold cross-validation, while the prediction model was designed using binary multivariate logistic regression. A visualization of the risk variables was created using a nomogram, while the calibration plot and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calibrate the prediction model. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. Eight optimal predictors that namely birth weight, small for gestation age (SGA), hypertensive disease complicating pregnancy (HDCP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), multiple births, cumulative duration of fasting, growth velocity and postnatal corticosteroids were introduced into the logistic regression equation to construct the EUGR prediction model. The area under the ROC curve of the training set and the external verification set was 83.1% and 84.6%, respectively. The calibration curve indicate that the model fits well. The DCA curve shows that the risk threshold for clinical application is 0-95% in both set. Introducing Birth weight, SGA, HDCP, GDM, Multiple births, Cumulative duration of fasting, Growth velocity and Postnatal corticosteroids into the nomogram increased its usefulness for predicting EUGR risk in very preterm infants.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeInfant, PrematureROC CurveBirth WeightDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLogistic ModelsMaleNomogramsPregnancyRisk FactorsExtrauterine growth retardationNomogramPredictionVery preterm infant

Identifiers

PMID38839838
PMCPMC11153599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.