ReviewHeart rhythm O22024
Antiarrhythmic effects of metformin.
Review in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac remodelling in type 2 diabetes: Pathophysiological mechanisms and opportunities for multiscale computational modelling and simulation.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Arrhythmias as Part of Long COVID Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients That Survived a Severe COVID-19 Infection and the Potential Protective Role of Metformin in These Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Complex interrelationship and therapeutic advances in diabetic patients with atrial fibrillation.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Metformin Protects Against Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in an Equine Model.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2025Article
- Concomitant Diabetes and Atrial Fibrillation: Epicardial Fat and Macrophage-Related Mechanisms.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Review
- Diverse Applications of the Anti-Diabetic Drug Metformin in Treating Human Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Is This Light at the End of the Tunnel?Vascular health and risk management · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) is a major public health problem and is associated with stroke, heart failure, dementia, and death. It is estimated that 20%-30% of Americans will develop AF at some point in their life. Current medications to prevent AF have limited efficacy and significant adverse effects. Newer and safer therapies to prevent AF are needed. Ventricular arrhythmias are less prevalent than AF but may have significant consequences including sudden cardiac death. Metformin is the most prescribed, first-line medication for treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM). It decreases hepatic glucose production but also reduces inflammation and oxidative stress. Experimental studies have shown that metformin improves metabolic, electrical, and histologic risk factors associated with AF and ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, in large clinical observational studies, metformin has been associated with a reduced risk of AF in people with DM. These data suggest that metformin may have antiarrhythmic properties and may be a candidate to be repurposed as a medication to prevent cardiac arrhythmias. In this article, we review the clinical observational and experimental evidence for the association between metformin and cardiac arrhythmias. We also discuss the potential antiarrhythmic mechanisms underlying this association. Repurposing a well-tolerated, safe, and inexpensive medication to prevent cardiac arrhythmias has significant positive public health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.