Evidence mapPaperPMID 38841304Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Exploring the self-efficacy of patients with diabetes: its role as a predictor of diabetes management and well-being.

Ayoub Ali Alshaikh, Faisal Saeed Al-Qahtani, Saif Aboud M Alqahtani, Ahmad Ali AlFarhan, Ali Mushabbab Al Nuwayhidh, Ayman Mohammed Madkhali, Riyad Saeed AlQahtani, Ali Fayez AlAsmari, Abdulaziz Saeed Alserhani, Hatim Ahmed Alqubaisi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ayoub Ali AlshaikhFamily and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal Saeed Al-QahtaniFamily and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Saif Aboud M AlqahtaniInternal Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Ali AlFarhanMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Mushabbab Al NuwayhidhMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ayman Mohammed MadkhaliMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Riyad Saeed AlQahtaniMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Fayez AlAsmariMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz Saeed AlserhaniMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Hatim Ahmed AlqubaisiClinical pharmacist Intern, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad Saad Saeed AldawhMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmalik Khalid Al Bin AhmadMedical Colleague, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ramy Mohamed GhazyFamily and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-efficacy is a popular psychological concept that refers to an individual's perception or belief in his ability to perform specific actions. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of self-efficacy, measured using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SEM6S) questionnaire, for diabetes management and overall well-being in patients with diabetes. Subject and methods: An anonymous online cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the self-efficacy of diabetic patients in the Asser region of Saudi Arabia. The participants were requested to upload their most recent glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measurements taken in the last three months, which helped in the accurate categorization of their diabetes as either controlled or uncontrolled. We used the valid Arabic version of the SEM6S and WHO-5 well-being questionnaires to assess patient self-efficacy and well-being. Results: A cohort of 342 patients was enrolled in the study, 67.25% were married, their mean age was 43.17 ± 17.61 years, and 52.69% had university-level or higher education. Among the participants, 46.0% exhibited well-being, while 24.9% reported poor well-being, including 9.4% who were identified as experiencing depression. The mean scores of self-efficacy and well-being were significantly higher among those with controlled diabetes versus uncontrolled diabetes (40.86 ± 13.26 vs. 36.48 ± 13.26) and (67.35 ± 21.22 vs. 60.93 ± 25.05), respectively. The predictors of glycemic control were self-efficacy [Odds ratio (OR)=1.03 (95%CI, 1.01-1.06, Conclusions: The study reveals that non-modifiable and modifiable factors, including self-efficacy, play a crucial role in diabetes control. The study recommends providing targeted educational interventions, using different social media platforms, psychosocial support programs, and inclusive healthcare policies to improve diabetes control and mental well-being among diabetic patients.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesGlycated Hemoglobindiabetes controldiabetes mellitusSaudi Arabiaself-efficacywell-being

Identifiers

PMID38841304
PMCPMC11151748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.