Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841619›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2024

Multi-risk factors joint prediction model for risk prediction of retinopathy of prematurity.

Shaobin Chen, Xinyu Zhao, Zhenquan Wu, Kangyang Cao, Yulin Zhang, Tao Tan, Chan-Tong Lam, Yanwu Xu, Guoming Zhang, Yue Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shaobin Chen *Faculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Gomes Street, Macao, China.
Xinyu Zhao *Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Shenzhen, 518040 China.
Zhenquan WuShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Shenzhen, 518040 China.
Kangyang CaoFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Gomes Street, Macao, China.
Yulin ZhangShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Shenzhen, 518040 China.
Tao TanFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Gomes Street, Macao, China.
Chan-Tong LamFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Gomes Street, Macao, China.
Yanwu XuSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangzhou; Pazhou Lab, China.
Guoming ZhangShenzhen Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Shenzhen, 518040 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2123-8125
Yue SunFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Gomes Street, Macao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a retinal vascular proliferative disease common in low birth weight and premature infants and is one of the main causes of blindness in children.In the context of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM), early screening, identification and treatment of ROP will directly contribute to improve patients' long-term visual prognosis and reduce the risk of blindness. Thus, our objective is to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm combined with clinical demographics to create a risk model for ROP including treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (TR-ROP) infants. Methods: A total of 22,569 infants who underwent routine ROP screening in Shenzhen Eye Hospital from March 2003 to September 2023 were collected, including 3335 infants with ROP and 1234 infants with TR-ROP among ROP infants. Two machine learning methods of logistic regression and decision tree and a deep learning method of multi-layer perceptron were trained by using the relevant combination of risk factors such as birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA), gender, whether multiple births (MB) and mode of delivery (MD) to achieve the risk prediction of ROP and TR-ROP. We used five evaluation metrics to evaluate the performance of the risk prediction model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUCPR) were the main measurement metrics. Results: In the risk prediction for ROP, the BW + GA demonstrated the optimal performance (mean ± SD, AUCPR: 0.4849 ± 0.0175, AUC: 0.8124 ± 0.0033). In the risk prediction of TR-ROP, reasonable performance can be achieved by using GA + BW + Gender + MD + MB (AUCPR: 0.2713 ± 0.0214, AUC: 0.8328 ± 0.0088). Conclusions: Combining risk factors with AI in screening programs for ROP could achieve risk prediction of ROP and TR-ROP, detect TR-ROP earlier and reduce the number of ROP examinations and unnecessary physiological stress in low-risk infants. Therefore, combining ROP-related biometric information with AI is a cost-effective strategy for predictive diagnostic, targeted prevention, and personalization of medical services in early screening and treatment of ROP.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiometric informationEarly screeningInfantPersonalized medicine (PPPM / 3 PM)PredictivePreventiveRetinopathy of prematurityRisk of blindness

Identifiers

PMID38841619
PMCPMC11147992

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.