Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38842572›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Mechanical models and measurement methods of solid stress in tumors.

Yingwei Bi, Jiacheng Jin, Rui Wang, Yuxin Liu, Liang Zhu, Jianbo Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yingwei Bi *Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road 222, Dalian, 116011, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0428-8879
Jiacheng Jin *Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road 222, Dalian, 116011, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-4460
Rui Wang *Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road 222, Dalian, 116011, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0589-2062
Yuxin LiuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road 222, Dalian, 116011, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3597-706X
Liang ZhuDalian University of Technology, Linggong Road 2, Dalian, 116081, China. zhuliang0210@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8202-0413
Jianbo WangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Zhongshan Road 222, Dalian, 116011, China. wangjianbo@dmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-3946

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81372761National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to genetic mutations, biomechanical factors also affect the structures and functions of the tumors during tumor growth, including solid stress, interstitial fluid pressure, stiffness, and microarchitecture. Solid stress affects tumors by compressing cancer and stromal cells and deforming blood and lymphatic vessels which reduce supply of oxygen, nutrients and drug delivery, making resistant to treatment. Researchers simulate the stress by creating mechanical models both in vitro and in vivo. Cell models in vitro are divided into two dimensions (2D) and three dimensions (3D). 2D models are simple to operate but exert pressure on apical surface of the cells. 3D models, the multicellular tumor spheres, are more consistent with the actual pathological state in human body. However, the models are more difficult to establish compared with the 2D models. Besides, the procedure of the animal models in vivo is even more complex and tougher to operate. Then, researchers challenged to quantify the solid stress through some measurement methods. We compared the advantages and limitations of these models and methods, which may help to explore new therapeutic targets for normalizing the tumor's physical microenvironment. KEY POINTS: •This is the first review to conclude the mechanical models and measurement methods in tumors. •The merit and demerit of these models and methods are compared. •Insights into further models are discussed.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalTumor MicroenvironmentMechanical modelMicroenvironmentSolid stressTumor

Identifiers

PMID38842572
PMCPMC11156757

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.