ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2024
Advances in 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine applications.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities in generating microvasculature using bioprinting techniques.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Stem Cell Therapy: Past, Present, and Future Aspects.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Prosthetic Corneal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Keratoprostheses and the Future Prospects of New Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of 3D Printing in Regenerative Medicine: A Game-Changer in Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Approaching Scarless Wound Healing: From Passive Anti-Fibrotic to Proactive and Programmable Pro-Regenerative Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- In Vivo Engraftment and Functional Efficacy of a 3D-Bioprinted Human Parathyroid Equivalent.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
- The application of tissue engineering in cartilage regeneration: technological advances and future challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Patient-specific 3D cryo(bio)printing of a glenoid labrum scaffold for fibrocartilaginous tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Regenerative medicine approaches for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries: progress and challenges.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Challenges and outcomes in pediatric and adult kidney transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinting Strategies in Autoimmune Disease Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Infertility-Related Female Reproductive System Diseases: A Review of Current and Future Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- An Overview of 3D Bioprinting Impact on Cell Viability: From Damage Assessment to Protection Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Tuning collagen and collagen-alginate mechanics through extrusion bioprinting process parameters.RSC advances · 2025Article
- High-Throughput 3D Bioprinted Organoids of Skin Cancer Utilized for Diagnosis and Personalized Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofabrication techniques allow for the construction of biocompatible and biofunctional structures composed from biomaterials, cells and biomolecules. Bioprinting is an emerging 3D printing method which utilizes biomaterial-based mixtures with cells and other biological constituents into printable suspensions known as bioinks. Coupled with automated design protocols and based on different modes for droplet deposition, 3D bioprinters are able to fabricate hydrogel-based objects with specific architecture and geometrical properties, providing the necessary environment that promotes cell growth and directs cell differentiation towards application-related lineages. For the preparation of such bioinks, various water-soluble biomaterials have been employed, including natural and synthetic biopolymers, and inorganic materials. Bioprinted constructs are considered to be one of the most promising avenues in regenerative medicine due to their native organ biomimicry. For a successful application, the bioprinted constructs should meet particular criteria such as optimal biological response, mechanical properties similar to the target tissue, high levels of reproducibility and printing fidelity, but also increased upscaling capability. In this review, we highlight the most recent advances in bioprinting, focusing on the regeneration of various tissues including bone, cartilage, cardiovascular, neural, skin and other organs such as liver, kidney, pancreas and lungs. We discuss the rapidly developing co-culture bioprinting systems used to resemble the complexity of tissues and organs and the crosstalk between various cell populations towards regeneration. Moreover, we report on the basic physical principles governing 3D bioprinting, and the ideal bioink properties based on the biomaterials' regenerative potential. We examine and critically discuss the present status of 3D bioprinting regarding its applicability and current limitations that need to be overcome to establish it at the forefront of artificial organ production and transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.