ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Artificial intelligence for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in personalised framework: a scoping review.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Umbrella Review of Applications and Translational Challenges.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of exosome-related therapy in cardiac revascularization procedures: a systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for delayed gastric emptying in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning-based myocardial infarction bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Wearable Devices in Cardiovascular Care: A Narrative Review of the Transition Toward Predictive, Preventive, Personalized, and Participatory Medicine.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Artificial intelligence and cardiovascular biobanks: Shared technological promise and ethical responsibility].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics: Current practice and attitudes among the clinical genetics workforce.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Foundation models for cardiovascular diseases and medicine.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Redox-Inflammation Axis in Atherosclerosis and Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Translational Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Computational intelligence using nailfold videocapillaroscopy for the prediction of carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort-based study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Current adoption of the Prosthodontic Diagnostic Index for clinical care-A cross-sectional survey study.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Intervening at the microbial crossroads: targeting inflammation across the oral-gut-reproductive microbiome crosstalk in atherosclerosis.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Review
- Cross-Generational Integration of Exercise and Nutritional Encoding in Offspring Adipose Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AI-Enabled Personalization of Semaglutide Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review With an Integration Framework.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in African Cardiovascular Care: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pathways to Improved Outcomes.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Distributed Precision Stroke Care: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Stroke Management Using Multimodal Sensor Data.Stroke · 2026Review
- Reliability of Handheld Ultrasound Assessment of Brachial Artery Flow-Mediated Dilation Using AI-Assisted Automated Analysis in Postmenopausal Women.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular risk detection and prediction among adults with obesity: a scoping review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The expanding role of artificial intelligence in personalised medicine: from innovation to individualized care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The field of precision medicine endeavors to transform the healthcare industry by advancing individualised strategies for diagnosis, treatment modalities, and predictive assessments. This is achieved by utilizing extensive multidimensional biological datasets encompassing diverse components, such as an individual's genetic makeup, functional attributes, and environmental influences. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, namely machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have exhibited remarkable efficacy in predicting the potential occurrence of specific cancers and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive scoping review guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. Our search strategy involved combining key terms related to CVD and AI using the Boolean operator AND. In August 2023, we conducted an extensive search across reputable scholarly databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and arXiv to gather relevant academic literature on personalised medicine for CVD. Subsequently, in January 2024, we extended our search to include internet search engines such as Google and various CVD websites. These searches were further updated in March 2024. Additionally, we reviewed the reference lists of the final selected research articles to identify any additional relevant literature. Findings: A total of 2307 records were identified during the process of conducting the study, consisting of 564 entries from external sites like arXiv and 1743 records found through database searching. After 430 duplicate articles were eliminated, 1877 items that remained were screened for relevancy. In this stage, 1241 articles remained for additional review after 158 irrelevant articles and 478 articles with insufficient data were removed. 355 articles were eliminated for being inaccessible, 726 for being written in a language other than English, and 281 for not having undergone peer review. Consequently, 121 studies were deemed suitable for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis. At the intersection of CVD, AI, and precision medicine, we found important scientific findings in our scoping review. Intricate pattern extraction from large, complicated genetic datasets is a skill that AI algorithms excel at, allowing for accurate disease diagnosis and CVD risk prediction. Furthermore, these investigations have uncovered unique genetic biomarkers linked to CVD, providing insight into the workings of the disease and possible treatment avenues. The construction of more precise predictive models and personalised treatment plans based on the genetic profiles of individual patients has been made possible by the revolutionary advancement of CVD risk assessment through the integration of AI and genomics. Interpretation: The systematic methodology employed ensured the thorough examination of available literature and the inclusion of relevant studies, contributing to the robustness and reliability of the study's findings. Our analysis stresses a crucial point in terms of the adaptability and versatility of AI solutions. AI algorithms designed in non-CVD domains such as in oncology, often include ideas and tactics that might be modified to address cardiovascular problems. Funding: No funding received.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.