ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating Changes in Pulsatile Flow With Endovascular Stents in an In Vitro Blood Vessel Model: Potential Implications for the Future Management of Neurovascular Compression Syndromes.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Posterior communicating artery vasospasm impairs cerebral pulsatility in an experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage model.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurovascular compression syndromes (NVCS), encompassing conditions such as trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia, significantly impair patient quality of life through abnormal vascular compression and micro-pulsation of vasculature on cranial nerves at the Obersteiner-Redlich zone. The modulation of pulsatile flow dynamics via endovascular stents presents a novel research frontier for alleviating these syndromes.
aimThe primary aim of this investigation was to delineate the impact of various endovascular stents on pulsatile flow within an in vitro model of a blood vessel, thereby elucidating their potential applicability in the therapeutic management of NVCS. MATERIALS AND
methodsA simple in vitro analog of a posterior circulation artery was developed, employing an intravenous pump to replicate cardiac-induced blood flow. Within this model, alterations in pulsatile flow were quantitatively assessed following the introduction of three categorically distinct endovascular stents, varying in size. This assessment was facilitated through the employment of both micro-Doppler and Doppler ultrasound methodologies.
resultsThe Pipeline 5x35 mm stent (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) demonstrated the most significant reductions in peak systolic velocity (Vmax) and pulsatility index (PI), PI especially over the stent, suggesting its potential for drastically altering blood flow dynamics. Similarly, Neuroform Atlas 4.5x30 mm and Neuroform Atlas 4x24 mm stents (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) also showed notable decreases in hemodynamic parameters, albeit to different extents. Statistical analysis confirmed that these changes were significantly different from the control (P < 0.0001 for PI and Vmax; P < 0.05 for inter-stent comparisons), except for proximal PI means, which did not significantly differ from the control (P = 0.2777).
conclusionThese findings affirm the potential of endovascular stents to substantially modulate arterial pulsatility. The observed decrease in pulsatile flow resultant from endovascular stent application has the potential to attenuate ectopic nerve excitation, a hallmark of NVCS. Consequently, this research highlights the prospective utility of endovascular stents in developing minimally invasive therapeutic approaches for NVCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.