ReviewCureus2024
The Role of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Imaging in Cerebrovascular Accident Detection.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Stroke Solutions Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review of the Literature.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) often occur suddenly and abruptly, leaving patients with long-lasting disabilities that place a huge emotional and economic burden on everyone involved. CVAs result when emboli or thrombi travel to the brain and impede blood flow; the subsequent lack of oxygen supply leads to ischemia and eventually tissue infarction. The most important factor determining the prognosis of CVA patients is time, specifically the time from the onset of disease to treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted neuroimaging alleviates the time constraints of analysis faced using traditional diagnostic imaging modalities, thus shortening the time from diagnosis to treatment. Numerous recent studies support the increased accuracy and processing capabilities of AI-assisted imaging modalities. However, the learning curve is steep, and huge barriers still exist preventing a full-scale implementation of this technology. Thus, the potential for AI to revolutionize medicine and healthcare delivery demands attention. This paper aims to elucidate the progress of AI-powered imaging in CVA diagnosis while considering traditional imaging techniques and suggesting methods to overcome adoption barriers in the hope that AI-assisted neuroimaging will be considered normal practice in the near future. There are multiple modalities for AI neuroimaging, all of which require collecting sufficient data to establish inclusive, accurate, and uniform detection platforms. Future efforts must focus on developing methods for data harmonization and standardization. Furthermore, transparency in the explainability of these technologies needs to be established to facilitate trust between physicians and AI-powered technology. This necessitates considerable resources, both financial and expertise wise which are not available everywhere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.