Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38848116›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Smartwatch-Based Interventions for People With Dementia: User-Centered Design Approach.

Doreen Goerss, Stefanie Köhler, Eleonora Rong, Anna Gesine Temp, Ingo Kilimann, Gerald Bieber, Stefan Teipel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Doreen GoerssDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-8349
Stefanie KöhlerDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7417-333X
Eleonora RongDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-9797-5574
Anna Gesine TempNeurozentrum, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-121X
Ingo KilimannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3269-4452
Gerald BieberFraunhofer Institut für Graphische Datenverarbeitung, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-6232
Stefan TeipelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3586-3194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssistive technologies can help people living with dementia maintain their everyday activities. Nevertheless, there is a gap between the potential and use of these materials. Involving future users may help close this gap, but the impact on people with dementia is unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to determine if user-centered development of smartwatch-based interventions together with people with dementia is feasible. In addition, we evaluated the extent to which user feedback is plausible and therefore helpful for technological improvements.

methodsWe examined the interactions between smartwatches and people with dementia or people with mild cognitive impairment. All participants were prompted to complete 2 tasks (drinking water and a specific cognitive task). Prompts were triggered using a smartphone as a remote control and were repeated up to 3 times if participants failed to complete a task. Overall, 50% (20/40) of the participants received regular prompts, and 50% (20/40) received intensive audiovisual prompts to perform everyday tasks. Participants' reactions were observed remotely via cameras. User feedback was captured via questionnaires, which included topics like usability, design, usefulness, and concerns. The internal consistency of the subscales was calculated. Plausibility was also checked using qualitative approaches.

resultsParticipants noted their preferences for particular functions and improvements. Patients struggled with rating using the Likert scale; therefore, we assisted them with completing the questionnaire. Usability (mean 78 out of 100, SD 15.22) and usefulness (mean 9 out of 12) were rated high. The smartwatch design was appealing to most participants (31/40, 76%). Only a few participants (6/40, 15%) were concerned about using the watch. Better usability was associated with better cognition. The observed success and self-rated task comprehension were in agreement for most participants (32/40, 80%). In different qualitative analyses, participants' responses were, in most cases, plausible. Only 8% (3/40) of the participants were completely unaware of their irregular task performance.

conclusionsPeople with dementia can have positive experiences with smartwatches. Most people with dementia provided valuable information. Developing assistive technologies together with people with dementia can help to prioritize the future development of functional and nonfunctional features.

Indexed as

DementiaSelf-Help DevicesSmartphoneUser-Centered DesignActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsSurveys and Questionnairesassistive technologydementiamobile phonesmartwatchusabilityuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID38848116
PMCPMC11193079

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.