ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024
Diagnostic Sensitivity and Symptomatic Relevance of Dopamine Transporter Imaging and Myocardial Sympathetic Scintigraphy in Patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delphi consensus guidelines for the use of striatal dopaminergic imaging and cardiac metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy for the diagnosis of dementia and mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) presents with various symptoms, posing challenges for early diagnosis challenging. Dopamine transporter (123I-FP-CIT) single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) imaging are crucial diagnostic biomarkers. Hypothesis about body- and brain-first subtypes of DLB indicate that some DLB may show normal 123I-FP-CIT or 123I-MIBG results; but the characteristic expression of these two subtypes remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of 123I-FP-CIT and 123I-MIBG imaging alone, combined in patients with DLB and explore symptoms associated with the abnormal imaging results. Methods: Demographic data, clinical status, and imaging results were retrospectively collected from patients diagnosed with possible DLB. Both images were quantified using semi-automated software, and the sensitivity of each imaging modality and their combination was calculated. Demographic data, cognition, and motor and non-motor symptoms were compared among the subgroups based on the imaging results. Symptoms related to each imaging abnormality were examined using binomial logistic regression analyses. Results: Among 114 patients with DLB, 80 underwent 123I-FP-CIT SPECT (sensitivity: 80.3%), 83 underwent 123I-MIBG imaging (68.2%), and 66 both (sensitivity of either abnormal result: 93.9%). Visual hallucinations differed among the four subgroups based on imaging results. Additionally, nocturia and orthostatic hypotension differed between abnormal and normal 123I-MIBG images. Conclusions: Overall, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT was slightly higher sensitivity than 123I-MIBG imaging, with combined imaging increasing diagnostic sensitivity. Normal results of a single imaging test may not refute DLB. Autonomic symptoms may lead to abnormal 123I-MIBG scintigraphy findings indicating body-first subtype of patients with DLB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.