Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38849515›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2024

Neurocognition and NMDAR co-agonists pathways in individuals with treatment resistant first-episode psychosis: a 3-year follow-up longitudinal study.

Sara Camporesi, Lijing Xin, Philippe Golay, Chin Bin Eap, Martine Cleusix, Michel Cuenod, Margot Fournier, Kenji Hashimoto, Raoul Jenni, Julie Ramain and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut microbiota: contributing to high CVD prevalence in people living with schizophrenia?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. UntargetedTranslational psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sara CamporesiCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lijing XinCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe GolayService of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-6241
Chin Bin EapCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-0230
Martine CleusixCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michel CuenodCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Margot FournierCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8906-1907
Kenji HashimotoDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8892-0439
Raoul JenniCenter for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6479-5381
Julie RamainService of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9679-1318
Romeo RestelliniService of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-8416-5921
Alessandra SolidaService of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe ConusService of General Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kim Q Do *Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1968-1646
Ines Khadimallah *Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland. ines.khadimallah@chuv.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-4455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether 1) individuals with treatment-resistant schizophrenia display early cognitive impairment compared to treatment-responders and healthy controls and 2) N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor hypofunction is an underlying mechanism of cognitive deficits in treatment-resistance. In this case‒control 3-year-follow-up longitudinal study, n = 697 patients with first-episode psychosis, aged 18 to 35, were screened for Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis criteria through an algorithm that assigns patients to responder, limited-response or treatment-resistant category (respectively resistant to 0, 1 or 2 antipsychotics). Assessments at baseline: MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery; N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor co-agonists biomarkers in brain by MRS (prefrontal glutamate levels) and plasma (D-serine and glutamate pathways key markers). Patients were compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 114). Results: patient mean age 23, 27% female. Treatment-resistant (n = 51) showed lower scores than responders (n = 183) in processing speed, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning and visual learning. Limited responders (n = 59) displayed an intermediary phenotype. Treatment-resistant and limited responders were merged in one group for the subsequent D-serine and glutamate pathway analyses. This group showed D-serine pathway dysregulation, with lower levels of the enzymes serine racemase and serine-hydroxymethyltransferase 1, and higher levels of the glutamate-cysteine transporter 3 than in responders. Better cognition was associated with higher D-serine and lower glutamate-cysteine transporter 3 levels only in responders; this association was disrupted in the treatment resistant group. Treatment resistant patients and limited responders displayed early cognitive and persistent functioning impairment. The dysregulation of NMDAR co-agonist pathways provides underlying molecular mechanisms for cognitive deficits in treatment-resistant first-episode psychosis. If replicated, our findings would open ways to mechanistic biomarkers guiding response-based patient stratification and targeting cognitive improvement in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsCognitive DysfunctionPsychotic DisordersReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAdolescentAdultBrainCase-Control StudiesCognitionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlutamic AcidHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological TestsAntipsychotic AgentsGlutamic AcidReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID38849515
PMCPMC11541217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.