Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38855539›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

RETHINKING INTERMEDIATE LAYERS DESIGN IN KNOWLEDGE DISTILLATION FOR KIDNEY AND LIVER TUMOR SEGMENTATION.

Vandan Gorade, Sparsh Mittal, Debesh Jha, Ulas Bagci

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vandan GoradeMachine & Hybrid Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, USA.
Sparsh MittalMehta Family School of DS&AI, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India.
Debesh JhaMachine & Hybrid Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, USA.
Ulas BagciMachine & Hybrid Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, USA.

Funding

Data Coordinating Center for the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis ConsortiumU01DK127384 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI Vernon M Chinchilli, Temel Tirkes · 2020 to 2026
$21.3M
Cyst-X: Interpretable Deep Learning Based Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cystic TumorsR01CA246704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Radiologist-Centered Artificial Intelligence (RCAI) for Lung Cancer Screening and DiagnosisR01CA240639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Hybrid Intelligence for Trustable Diagnosis And Patient Management of Prostate Cancer (HIT-PIRADS)U01CA268808 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Ulas Bagci · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246704NCI NIH HHS U01 CA268808NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge distillation (KD) has demonstrated remarkable success across various domains, but its application to medical imaging tasks, such as kidney and liver tumor segmentation, has encountered challenges. Many existing KD methods are not specifically tailored for these tasks. Moreover, prevalent KD methods often lack a careful consideration of 'what' and 'from where' to distill knowledge from the teacher to the student. This oversight may lead to issues like the accumulation of training bias within shallower student layers, potentially compromising the effectiveness of KD. To address these challenges, we propose Hierarchical Layer-selective Feedback Distillation (HLFD). HLFD strategically distills knowledge from a combination of middle layers to earlier layers and transfers final layer knowledge to intermediate layers at both the feature and pixel levels. This design allows the model to learn higher-quality representations from earlier layers, resulting in a robust and compact student model. Extensive quantitative evaluations reveal that HLFD outperforms existing methods by a significant margin. For example, in the kidney segmentation task, HLFD surpasses the student model (without KD) by over 10%, significantly improving its focus on tumor-specific features. From a qualitative standpoint, the student model trained using HLFD excels at suppressing irrelevant information and can focus sharply on tumor-specific details, which opens a new pathway for more efficient and accurate diagnostic tools. Code is available here.

Identifiers

PMID38855539
PMCPMC11160864

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.