Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38856170›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Improving multi-population genomic prediction accuracy using multi-trait GBLUP models which incorporate global or local genetic correlation information.

Jun Teng, Tingting Zhai, Xinyi Zhang, Changheng Zhao, Wenwen Wang, Hui Tang, Dan Wang, Yingli Shang, Chao Ning, Qin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun TengShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Tingting ZhaiNational Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, College of Life Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Xinyi ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Changheng ZhaoShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Wenwen WangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Hui TangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Dan WangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Yingli ShangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.
Chao NingShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8247-1700
Qin ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-5020

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1200900National Natural Science Foundation of China 32002172Project of Genetic Improvement for Agricultural Species of Shandong Province 2019LZGC011Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2020QC175Yangzhou University Interdisciplinary Research Foundation for Animal Science Discipline of Targeted Support yzuxk202016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the application of genomic prediction, a situation often faced is that there are multiple populations in which genomic prediction (GP) need to be conducted. A common way to handle the multi-population GP is simply to combine the multiple populations into a single population. However, since these populations may be subject to different environments, there may exist genotype-environment interactions which may affect the accuracy of genomic prediction. In this study, we demonstrated that multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (MTGBLUP) can be used for multi-population genomic prediction, whereby the performances of a trait in different populations are regarded as different traits, and thus multi-population prediction is regarded as multi-trait prediction by employing the between-population genetic correlation. Using real datasets, we proved that MTGBLUP outperformed the conventional multi-population model that simply combines different populations together. We further proposed that MTGBLUP can be improved by partitioning the global between-population genetic correlation into local genetic correlations (LGC). We suggested two LGC models, LGC-model-1 and LGC-model-2, which partition the genome into regions with and without significant LGC (LGC-model-1) or regions with and without strong LGC (LGC-model-2). In analysis of real datasets, we demonstrated that the LGC models could increase universally the prediction accuracy and the relative improvement over MTGBLUP reached up to 163.86% (25.64% on average).

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticAlgorithmsGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansQuantitative Trait Locigenomic predictionglobal genetic correlationlocal genetic correlationMTGBLUPmulti-population

Identifiers

PMID38856170
PMCPMC11163384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.